I think it was the Hills or The City.

I've heard a number of commenters on Gawker say that they were unfollowed for similar types of offenses. I think my main problem with kinja is that someone needs to think you're cool or funny or important enough to follow you in the first place. And given that the system then uses stars for comments, it's just a bit…

Elizabeth Banks? She's got that sweet but cheeky sense of humor thing, and kinda looks like a young Dolly.

Oooooh ok let's discuss who would be better.

Lol @ "turn of the century"

Was thinking JSimps mixed with Fergie.

Ditto. Case in point- my original comment has double-digit stars. But I have almost no followers. I think the following thing has become moot, because, well, what's the point? It makes more sense that people with lots of stars get bumped up to non-grey status. Or something. I DUNNO JUST FIX IT.

ERMAGEHRD YOU SERD PERNERRTRTRATRTED.

The last ten years must have been like Final Destination.

Raspberries?! Bish, move ovah.

Time to follow everything Thalia does on social media, I guess!

Nope. No you don't. Not when you look eleven. NOPE.

<Pointy-finger-this.gif>

Thanks! I THINK I'M FUN!

What I do love is dismissing commenters. Bye!

Yeah. I get starred a lot, but Jezebel followed me once, until I noticed a semantical error in an article and pointed it out, and BOOM! Back to the greys for me.

Okay. So can we also do a thing where if a commenter's history clearly shows a commitment to thoughtful commentary, they get approved by GM? Because this grey nonsense is really tiring to those of us who comment regularly, and whenever kinja updates, have to prove ourselves time and time again like we're trying to…

"What the fuck was Gawker thinking with that Koko article?"

I think a lot of folks are misunderstanding you. I get what you are saying, and I think there are a couple things you need a better understanding of:

It's ROXANES now. How many points for me?