Kind of a weird question:

Kind of a weird question:

yeah, not to mention...is there a way we can download and play it when it’s done?

From my understanding, they broke into two parts so sales from part 1 could continue funding development. For anyone who backed it, thinking their passionate support single-handedly made that game happen, and see it turn into a run for more funding...it does kinda stink.

The publisher is almost always the cause of the external issues.

Given infinite time and money, any creative person would work on it until they deem it of quality.

When I saw that map, I smiled like a big dummy

I wasn’t speaking against the anonymity of online identities though.

So you’re encouraging a privately-owned police force?

Yeah, but that’s kinda the point.

you had me at ‘legalize kicking puppies’

This may just be the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen in my life.

Took the words out of my mouth - unless these are part of a ‘based on true events’ series about the people who played, or made, Tetris, I’m not interested.

is it basically the same release we got on Steam? I’ve bought this thing twice already (PS3/PC), and not sure if I’m ready to do for three...

This is exactly how I’ve been feeling!

Yeah - and what do you know? It’s really friggin’ good!

Won’t lie - I wanted to read New Frontier for his art alone. Had no clue who was writing it, didn’t really concern me. Just...that art, man.

I wish these man-babies would grow up.

No.

The question should be “Did this content actually NEED to be changed or altered to accomplish what the goal in question was?” or “Would not changing this content have hindered the goal in question?” ; the “goal” here being conveying the intended feeling or experience of the original, presumably.

See, because what a dictionary says, and what’s actually law according to a constitution...well, fuck the constitution, amirite?