istherecheddar-
is there cheddar?
istherecheddar-

Dreadwig and the Angry Squinch

Frankly any bro who would wear one of these shirts is doing us all a favor. It is a beacon that screams "Stay very very far away from me."

"Sex can be an overrated activity."

Further into the article, it discusses vaginal tearing. Regardless of his endowment, your assertion is that she may have coerced him. Why would anyone coerce an unwilling participant into ripping their vaginal flesh apart at the relatively sexually inexperienced age of 14? Do you imagine that her rape of him felt

Hey, if this ever goes to trial, you should volunteer to defend those two fucking scumbags — you seem pretty invested in them getting off.

If we're laying Daniel's drug problems at his mother's feet, it would be fairer to link them to her history of drug abuse, not her openness regarding nudity.

not automatically. When a 17 year old basically force feeds a girl alcohol, has sex with her, has his buddies film it, and her rape kit is positive...then it's rape. THAT's WHEN IT IS RAPE YOU FUCKING MORON! oh not to forget they confessed. Use some brain cells popmolly, classy name BTW.

And he's the one who left her on her porch unconscious in freezing weather. You are saying that flirting, "ignoring her brother's warning" and texting = taking advantage. You are literally defending a rapist right now. Literally. Are you this dude? Because otherwise that makes 0 sense.

ha, troll on brother.

No, a 17 year old taking advantage of a drunk 14 year old is still rape these days.

If she is intoxicated and incapable of forming consent?

Yes.

Those girls were raped. They were underage. They were incapable of consent. How can these law enforcement officials say they did their job well when 17-year-olds had sex with minor girls? Let's not blame the town. Let's blame the families who raised rapist sons, and the son who thinks all girls want his D, and

It's perfectly valid to refer to her as a "mom" because it lets the reader know that besides parents, siblings, friends, lovers, life partners, and all other people a person's life may have touched and who will be potentially devastated when they die, this person will also leave behind a child who will grow up without

Nailed it.

Yeah, because only white people get cancer (and all white women are rich or middle class soccer moms), and only people of colour use WIC or other similar programs. Every individual matters, this woman matters, and someone of any colour dying of an extremely rare cancer who cannot get treatment anywhere else is more

As a general rule, I'm totally on board with not referring to women as "moms" if we're talking about them in a context that doesn't really involve parenthood, especially if men wouldn't be referred to as fathers in the same context (i.e. that stupid "diapers and diplomacy" thing).