issapostmoderno--disqus
Issa
issapostmoderno--disqus

Thank you!

That's very interesting!
Could you provide some sources please?

Well, I'm not going to tell you what should and shouldn't offend you, and if you genuinely find it insulting I don't know how to reply except that I respect that, but I really don't share your point of view.

Would you really say that that's a homophobic episode? You could argue that f@g is not they're word to reclaim in the first place, but to me it is a bit of an overkill, since it is ultimately a very silly and inoffensive episode on the whole.
Also, I think that the Jesse Jackson episode is overall a better take on the

I'd say that their history with trans issues in particular is undoubtedly problematic, expecially in those older episodes about Garrison, and I think they've shown some progress on the matter with that recent episode.
As a gay man myself I think that SP has usually been accepting and non-judgemental when it comes to

You wouldn't, I would and I'm fine with that :)
(What I'm not really fine with is being called an idiot for enjoying a TV-show).
Also, as I said, I agree with you on the simplistic and privileged and crude bit, just not really on the obtuse.

Well, that seemed to be kind of a given since we're talking about a mainstream TV-show. I mean, it's not exactly Bauman :'D
My point is that you can still enjoy the show even if you don't agree with Parker's take on the issues at hand (and probably even more if you don't) because of the layered and clever way in which

You're wrong because (a) South Park is an extremely self-conscious show, to the point that everything in it can (and should) be read in multiple ways (a clear example of this would be the SP movie, I think) (b) it is a far more clever show than its attitude would let you to believe and (c) some of your points are

Oh, it's just that as a kid my favourite movies were The Aristocats and One Hundred and One Dalmatians - I literally consumed the VHS - and they were already pretty old films even back then.

This thing was way harder than I thought (and it made me realize that eventually I should catch up with a whole lot of recent stuff I have not seen yet!).
1994: Three Colors - Red
1995: Maborosi
1996: Romeo + Juliet
1997: Funny Games
1998: Flowers of Shanghai
1999: Beau Travail
2000: In the Mood for Love
2001: Spirited Away
20

I want an empty stage and a minute of deafening silence.

Who says that lying's not an aaaaaaart… ♫♪

The ending to this episode with the ship pointing towards the open sea (as a symbol of adventure and more generally of engagement with the world) was truly beautiful and arresting.
I just wished for it to go on and on for a bit more.
Still, amazing miniseries.

But… but…

First, SP is *not* a kids show.
Second, you'd have to watch the show with your brain turned off to take away all that from it (and ok, I'll admit that unsupervised kids and right wings lunatics probably do watch it like that, but turned off brains seem to be affecting a way larger segment of the general population than

No, that would not necessarily suggest a higher total for Stein as well (nor a bigger gap, in fact).
Nevertheless you're right, so thanks for the info!
PS. The 70,000 stat came from this apparently out-of-date CNN web page.
http://edition.cnn.com/elec…

Actually no.
That's true in both Michigan and Wisconsin, not in Pennsylvania (Trump won by almost 70,000 votes).

Make it gay or you'll never have my money.
(Okay, you probably wouldn't have had it anyways, but still).
#ScorbusOrGTFO

Ok.
My first reaction was NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
But then I 'member'd that it's on the CW, so maybe it'll be good, I hope.
Still, y tho…