Who took over Trumpster twitter?? It’s way too coherent for him.

Maybe the reason he’s pissed off is he’s not being pissed on?

It’s so appropriate that the de facto leader of the so-called “anti-PC movement” is someone who absolutely cannot take a fucking joke.

The way Trump is going, SNL making fun of his unsubstantiated sexual perversions will be the least of his troubles. I think the Russians do have the dirt on this moron, and I think it’s going to come out eventually, and I think it’s going to be real ugly for him. 

There’s a documentary on his relationship with that cousin and it is absolutely fucking terrifying.

After I explained the whole golden showers thing to my 87 yr old boss, who has been comparing him to Hitler for a year, that was the first thing he said - that there was a very similar story about Hitler and a very young female cousin of his who lived with him under suspicious circumstances and eventually killed…

Not many brought this up. Hitler had a shit (not pee) scandal he had which was reported by the German tabloids in an attempt to make him look bad. Never been proven, but very similar parallels to the Pissident-elect

This is driving me crazy. As a former (low level) intel analyst seeing how Trump is acting towards the intel community hurts me. Is there flawed intelligence? Absolutely. That is why any analyst worth anything will pepper briefs and papers with terms like approximately, in vicinity of, assessed and various levels of…

You know, I’ve looked and I’ve looked and I just can’t see anywhere in my comment where I said a single fucking thing about Hillary Clinton.

As the residents of Trumpistan are so fond of saying, she lost. Get over it. Focus on the short-fingered piss golem we’ve got to deal with now.

My expectations and hopes are unbelievably low. I’ll actually consider the next four years a success if there are no nuclear weapons deployed and no significant land wars. I’m assuming that the economy, the social safety net, and basic human decency are already doomed.

Right?

No, I get the point. It’s just a stupid one. If the newsworthy fact is the existence of the dossier, you can report on the existence of the dossier. Republishing its contents without independent corroboration is just thinly-veiled cover for essentially reporting them as true without having to take responsibility.

Albert, I’d really appreciate your reply if possible — I am curious where and how you are defining the line between say, some jamoke making up a rumor for the tabloids about Trump liking piss sex with... whatever this story is?

“As you might expect, much of the talk around media today is about journalism ethics and responsibility. What may surprise and horrify you—or anyway should—is that by and large the journalists being accused of dereliction are not the ones who participated in the circulation of this explosively and undeniably…

You are wrong. And this line of thinking is a primary reason there is such distrust of news media.

When a powerful U.S. Senator is delivering copies of Pizzagate conspiracy theory manifestos to the director of the FBI, this equivalence will become valid.

I thought reporters weren’t supposed to release things until it get verified by like 2 or 3 separate sources?

That’s a loose definition of “news.” Remember when we used to mock FOX News for “We Report, You Decide?”

Hell hath no fury like a journalist scooped.

Why yes. Yes, I do.