Popularity.

This is the result of 8 mile a day runs, moderate weight training, combined with good sleep at my ripe old 50 yrs!

Or -- and hear me out, because this is a little wild -- two well-crafted shows can succeed without either of them needing to be a reaction to the other or their audiences.

I don’t know, I’ve decided that purposefully inhaling any carcinogens into my lungs is not something I need to do going forward. 

I’m surprised weed isn’t on this list, as there isn’t a lot of solid evidence to back up the various claims about its benefits. One thing I’m surprised I don’t see more often is discussion around the health effects of smoking it. Over the past couple of months I’ve made a shift from smoking to other methods of…

With all of these the dose makes the poison or the cure, except for which exercise is best. Exercise is in and of itself stress to the body, but it also helps your body better deal with stress.

And for me, Caesar

Yes... the body reacts to caloric restriction through a process called metabolic adaptation. However, that is accounted for in the Calories Out part of CICO. Just like calories in isn’t a static amount, calories out isn’t a static amount either. It adjusts which is why as you continue to diet you have to further lower…

Lock yourself in a room and eat nothing for a month. I guarantee you’ll lose weight. Anybody that says they diet all the time and can’t lose weight are sneaking pizza slices and ice cream bars.

Read the comments here and see how many people are resistant to the fact that calories in, calories out governs how our body gains, maintains, and loses weight. The sugar one is my personal favorite of misinformation.

You were in a caloric deficit therefore you lost weight. Intermittent fasting allowed you to be in a caloric deficit so you could lose weight. However, if you were in an equivalent caloric deficit WITHOUT intermittent fasting, you’d still have lost weight. That is what the study is saying.

Nice satire...this is satire, right?

The theory however is wrong. All benefits of time restrictive eating are a result of caloric restriction. There are peer reviewed high quality studies showing this, they’re in agreement, time restrictive eating has no physiological difference in the long term on human health as opposed to any other form of caloric…

Literally everything this dude wrote is wrong, though lots of hucksters pushing it on social media. 

Nice mechanistic theory. Literally no study supports this. The insulin model has been discredited countless times. This is quackery. I eat over 100 grams of sugar a day and over 300 carbs most days, while maintaining 13% body fat and have lost and maintained over a 60 lbs of fat loss. If your theory was correct that…

There are literally studies showing that artificial sweeteners have no affect on insulin. There are also studies comparing low fat vs low carb diets in a metabolic ward (an incredibly accurate way of measuring caloric expenditure and thus fat loss) and there was no statistical difference, although the low fat group…

The number of things wrong with this comment would make VoluntaryProofreader have to go for a lie down.

Every year when I explain to non-Muslims how Ramadan fasting works they always says “you must lose a ton of weight” and I always just shake my head because when you eat doesn’t dictate losing weight, it’s how much you eat.  And when you fast for long stretches of time in a day you tend to make bad choices when you do…

“It doesn’t matter when you’re eating, so much as what you’re eating.”

Appeal to authority to justify the previous fallacy…