irisj
IrisJ
irisj

Another childless-by-choice woman here, and I agree — not having children isn’t BRAVE. I don’t have kids because I love having a free and easy lifestyle and, as Adele says, doing whatever I want whenever the fuck I want. I also find children very annoying and teenagers even MORE annoying. I simply don’t want to deal

But now we have proof that Trump, as much as I cringe to admit it, was RIGHT about that. This is why it looks so fucking bad and stupid of Brazile. It was silly of Trump to bring it up, perhaps, but, by God — he was right!!!

But that’s exactly why this was so stupid. Why did Brazile do this for a supposedly exceedingly well-prepped candidate?

Uh, no. She did do something wrong. What the hell?

You clearly can’t handle adult conversation so are forced to resort to lowest-common-denominator retorts such as “Go fuck yourself.”

This is exactly why you SHOULD be worked up. Bullshit like this easily adds fuel to the fire of the Trumpster narrative. And, this time, we can’t even say they’re wrong.

It was for the Bernie debate, NOT the Trump debates.

I think that pretty much anyone who runs for president almost HAS to have some dangerous levels of narcissism. For most “normal”
folks, it’s hard to understand why anyone would want that fucking job.

But — we’re talking about Brazile here, not Lewandowski. Let’s stick to the topic at hand.

It’s very Trumpian.

It’s not like she couldn’t have predicted a Flint question would come up in a debate set in Michigan.

I’m sorry, but if Bill could not understand that this ONE particular meeting would look bad JUST at the time when the DOJ was nearing completion of its examination of Hillary and her emails, then he is not nearly as smart a politician as he is given credit for.

This was not for a debate against Trump, it was during the primaries (Bernie).

Unfortunately, Brazile outright lied about passing on the questions, clearly saying she would NEVER do that. The statement she put out denying that she did what it turns out she did communicated that it would be wrong of her to do so.

You’re making my point for me. The Clintons should know that, because of how the Repubs spin things, certain actions are going to look bad, even if they aren’t. Therefore, they should be smart enough to be careful and not do anything that they should KNOW will be spun this way.

Even when it’s over, it won’t be “over.” The next four years are going to be — fun.

I’ve said that for a long time — I wish she could have divorced him. He’s shitty baggage at this point, and a shadow of his formerly charismatic self.

Yes, of course, all of that is noted in the link I pasted as well. We were talking about different things. Overall, Trump’s path to winning is still very narrow, which is what serious electoral map wonks have been noting for months.

The electoral race does NOT favor Trump at this time:

That should have read, four presidential *candidates,* of course.