irishnorthern
Irishish
irishnorthern

To be fair, most white people are comfortable with jokes about race as long as they’re the ones making it, not the ones receiving it. At least from my experience. Props to Wilmore though. His show deserves more recognition than it gets.

That’s one way to get them out of the gene pool.

“The kind of man who wants one of these things has an issue with seeing women as full human beings.”

They are as unethical as dildos. They serve a purpose. Sex. Also, there are sex dolls of men out there. (NSFW) And, sure, the market for male sex dolls is not as big as the market for female sex dolls. But I am willing to bet my bottom dollar the more realistic and interactive they become the bigger the male sex robot

Is it better, worse, or the same as a fleshlight because it has a face? I’m genuinely asking.

I assume it’s because the stereotype is basically of a man wanting to control and have a full fake relationship with a woman he can’t have ala Spike in Buffy. But what you’re saying is totally true — the market for a Tom Hiddleston or a Thelma and Louise era Brad Pitt would probably be significant (although tbh I

This is a fascinating article. There is a lot of things I haven’t considered. However I am still hard pressed to rile against sex robots. Yeah it removes the actual human interaction, but it also removes the actual human exploitation risk that prostitution has.

I can’t wait for robot brothels so dudes who just want to get laid will stop texting me pictures of their peens and asking me to “chill and smoke a bowl or whatever”. It would perhaps eliminate a huge group of fuckboys from the dating pool, and that to me is beautiful.

I remember a while back there was an article about child dolls. Yes - huge red flag that is awful and terrible. BUT better a doll than an actual child?

In my entirely unqualified opinion, sex robots of an actual human being who has not consented to have a sex robot made of her/him are unethical, creepy, and really borderline a violation, but sex robots not made in the likeness of a specific human being or made with a person’s permission are not unethical. Creepy to

I love you so much PHILLIP J FRY

As a survivor you shouldn’t be trying to push legal precedents that would make rape cases even more difficult to successfully even take to trial, let alone win.

“Christ”

For some reason, while this post consists entirely of sensible and readable thoughts, it is utterly incomprehensible to me. I have not the faintest clue what point is being made, despite having no trouble understanding any of the constituent sentences or words.

Wait, so if a man rapes another man it’s because he’s a misogynist? Are you saying that?

A hate crime is defined as “motivated by... sexual prejudice.” Of course that is true of many rapes, but in many cases it would either be untrue or impossible to prove.

Wrong. Rape is about power and dominance at its core. It’s not just a sexual expression. Jesus. This isn’t about a sexual peccadillo.

Capitalizing letters! Passion!

No hate crime sociology isn’t shitty. It has been extensively researched and scientifically studied. You don’t like what the science say so you deem it shitty. That’s no different than someone arguing against the science that says being gay isn’t a choice because the bible tells them so. It’s on the exact same

It’s just.... rape? A man murdering a woman isn’t a murder related hate crime, it’s just fucking murder. And it’s atrocious and horrible and should be prosecuted to the highest degree. I have no idea where hate crimes came into the picture, but it’s a strange direction to go in my opinion. <— me, having no legal