ionizeddare
IonizedDare
ionizeddare

I would argue the reason why it’s more rare to see someone with that type of job wearing locs has everything to do with discrimination and nothing to do with the hairstyle.

Yes, I don't know why Huffman is saying more counselors were needed for this. She and her husband both went to college and then there's the internet. Getting your act together for college and applying shouldn't require much outside help for their family. I did it practically all on my own and saw a counselor three

Nothing fair about this. If you’re told your kid’s grades need a boost, buy Schaum Outlines and hire a a tutor to help them work through it. Even if you’re amoral, just realize that would  cost less than cheating anyways because if you have to cheat to get into college, you sure are going to gave to keep cheating to

I feel she (and possibly the kid who asked for the haircut) are definitely implying that locks are part of bad living and cutting them off means you're finally leaving delinquency behind. That's a terribly rude and stupid point of view. Whatever that kid was into, his hair didn't make him do it or keep him from

I could well believe that. No matter how clearly you explain it they make a point of not connecting the dots on examples of near slavery we’re already dealing with like our outrageously high incarceration rate of people we then turn around and make work for pennies per hour.

Same.

Those drawings are-

Saying that young white people are less racist than older ones is a myth that’s been getting retold since boomers were young enough to be hippies. In reality, when you look at most of the social and civil rights progress in this country it was fought for and voted on by people who’d be centenarians or older.

Yes, people used to go to rallies and big meetings with noisemakers including small metal horns with rubber pumps or canned air connected to blow them.

Well she could read the transcript of the custody trial when he tried to gain control of his victim. Although, for me, the fact that he ended up with his ex girlfriend’s daughter-regardless of her age- was all I needed to know. She’s self-serving trash, end of story.

Another danger sign? He's yelling at her in an apartment, a place full of potential witnesses, so how much farther will this go when they're in a house. Worse still a house that belonged to a family member meaning neighbors might give him more leeway than if he was simply a stranger to them. I'd leave before the move

Probably, at the very least she approves of Roman Polanski enough to name her son after him, so...

Congratulations on doing it!

I've seen fanny packs but they were worn across the body-a bit like a backpack. It's taking a bad idea and making it worse.

This isn’t just for the kids’ benefit though. When my daughter was starting school I bought her some cute containers that turned out to be hard to open even for me. If I hadn’t practiced eating out of a lunchbox with her I wouldn’t have noticed it.

These are lots of good ideas, especially getting kids used to opening containers or repackaging items that are too hard to open. We had picnics to practice eating what you bring but obviously timing the meal would have been an improvement.

He yelled that at McDreamy not TR Knight who wasn’t even on the set at the time (or out for that matter). Washington should never have used that word as a slur but TR Knight made it all about him for his own reasons.

There’s no lack of consent in your DLR story, groupies and rock stars are gonna groupie and rock star but Cosby drugged women and Woody went after minors. Big difference.

No it does not. Read the public record. He couldn’t have been exonerated or found guilty of abuse because that’s not what those hearings were about.

I too was more perplexed that someone got paid a million bucks to write a screenplay based on a successful book. I can that happening for an entirely original script but that much money to essentially write a summary?