I meant to write,
Yes, I think that’s where there going with this.
If they’re still doing it when they’re old enough to be sent to military school, that was always considered a sign you belonged in an institution. Papa Trump was tolerant for a parent of that era.
Are your Trumpkins still saying there was no collusion? Make them adjust their foil hats more carefully because my Trumpkins are already over that hump. You see, there was collusion but it was for the greater good of the country.
Yes, I was confused about that for a second but then I remembered that conservatives routinely have their own definition of what words mean and they have nothing to do with reality.
I understand, it’s just that I’m always bothered that statistics like these get taken as gospel to the point that people debate what they mean when the truth is they’re worthless.
I hadn’t heard about this and since the court documents seem to have come to the surface now it may still be worth a post to one of the writers here.
Or they could question the validity of the statistics themselves? All they show is the statistics about who got caught or pleaded guilty, that says more about law enforcement than crime and criminals. They can’t tell us about who committed unsolved crimes or those the cops don’t even know about because they’ve gone…
Thanks for the link. You should email this to one of the writers or editors. Their email is under their name at the bottom of posts.
If AL is being bashed it’s by his own words. Why should he get credit for the great ones “Four score and...” and not get shamed for the lousy ones? Men like Washington and Jefferson lived in a time when abolitionist sentiment and/or movements existed, nonetheless, they were fine with taking part in mass kidnapping…
People still under the impression that it was bad mortgages to minorities (subprimes) that caused the recession of 2008-2009 need to read this.
They certainly could. The transition has been going on for years, the character would look radically different by now.
It’s subtler than that since they’ve had decades to refine the system to get around anti-redlining measures.
True, but it’s outrageous that the same people who make it nearly impossible for minorities to transform their income into wealth-e.g.by buying an asset that increases in value like a home- could point to the net worth gap they createdas a reason to continue to deny minorities access to mortgages. It’s like someone…
This is a chicken and egg situation, if you’re allowed to get mortgages you’ll have more net worth than a people who rent. Someone who’s only allowed to own their furniture and car will logically have less net worth than someone who’s allowed to own their furniture, car and an asset like a house. That’s the reality.…
True enough but then why was an opaque credit score rating system adopted to determine people’s ability to take on a mortgage? It’s funny how no rating system that favors minorities ever becomes the default, it’s always the one which stacks the deck against them.
I think the bag in my trunk serves the same purpose for me. I’ve seen the item, if it had a problem (i.e. missing button) I fixed it so it could be donated. If I don’t feel the need to retrieve it in however weeks or months before I give it away, I really didn’t need it.
They sure are. I always arrange by color, my woolens are folded not hung and almost everything else can be worn in every season depending on the weather.If this bra arrangement stops working for me the next solution I try is this,