insaneinthemainframe--disqus
Tech Belcher
insaneinthemainframe--disqus

Did that Pokémon fansite explain why Red was such a brooding little bitch on the top of that mountain?

Of course it was Iwata who saved the day. Damn, do I miss that man.

Also, it's just getting stunning with the graphics and gameplay. I mean, actually getting to fly around on Latias/Latios in Omega Ruby/Alpha Sapphire? That was amazing. The worlds are really getting beautiful, they're able to play with the 3D graphics more, the things they're managing to do as they expand and update

Wasn't that absolutely amazing? Going back to Kanto and seeing how things changed from the original game, facing a whole other set of leader, more Pokémon. God, I remember just being blown away by that kind of thought and expansion to the game.

This bubble has to burst sometime, but here's hoping it's not before Hollywood takes some notes from the inclusiveness and diversity that exists at least a little more in the television sector.

Whedon, the Phil Lord and Chris Miller*, there's quite a few of them, really.

Yes, definitely. TV is far more conducive to collaboration since they have little pockets of self-contained story rather than one big project to complete, and it provides the challenge of still maintaining a show's singular voice despite that. And it's pretty much because of the reasons you described, so many talents

I know. I'm glad I only recognize a few of them.

A lot of TV shows do have female directors, but I'm willing to bet they'd still be in the minority of any show that employs a rotating group of directors in such a way. Pam Cooke's done some of my favourite American Dad! episodes, but she's also probably only one of like four (with dozens of men on the other side).

Go away, troll. I've asked you to stop engaging with me. Don't be a dick about it.

And I don't hold any weight in your anecdotal explanations as to why my interpretation of the evidence they showed and scenarios they described to us several times over must be wrong. Just sayin'.

I'm glad I have you here today, @avclub-d0cf409eb912cc0cc950b41b6d892d07:disqus. I thought I was going crazy for not loving this one. I mean, I thought it was pretty good but a little forced and disjointed in some regards. Still some great laughs, a good episode in a pretty great season, but not an A by any means. And

Wow, I was just about to post saying I thought it might be the worst so far. The worst of a pretty fantastic season, but the worst nonetheless.

Trump seems more stupid, but at least he lays his ignorance out for people to see. He doesn't seem to be at the level of blatantly evil that Cruz is.

Yes, that is the problem. Perhaps the most powerful men in Hollywood should start to become an active part of the solution instead of turning their back on the problem when it comes to choosing who to work with. That is what this article is trying to get across, that they're passively involved with allowing

It really doesn't. These guys should feel a little ashamed that they don't use their significant status to create more inclusive working environments considering some of them have more than 30 projects under their belt that they've chosen to be a part of, not one helmed by a woman. Few of them don't get producer

See, you're making that joke, but from looking at the comments, it was needed and clearly not enough to get their point across.

AV Club snark that should be appreciated in the AV Club of all places?

Yeah, a lot of you keep saying that, but I didn't get that impression at all. It mostly just seemed like they were stating very plain facts with results that are discouraging, and therefore viewed as negative by a lot of people. I don't know how the AV Club was supposed to spice up those stats to make them seem like a

It's almost as if that's part of the problem.