Yeah. It actually took me a surprising amount of time to recognize him as the husband in On Becoming a God in Central Florida. I knew I knew who it was, but I kept being puzzled. And then I was floored. I mean once you know it’s him it’s clearly him, but man did he do a hell of a job transforming from sexy cosmopolitan…

And oh what thoughts and prayers they are, Milo.

No support for candidates who don’t unequivocally support full Medicaire For All.

11/22/63 and Duma Key are two of the best King books. Revival is also awesome and Joyland might be short but it’s excellent.

Are you going to explain how exactly I was sexist in my response and under what circumstances Elizabeth Warren’s policy choices can be critiqued without you declaring it sexist?

What sexism, please? I find her as intelligent and competent as anyone. I have felt that way for several years. I have problems with her policies, which I don’t believe go remotely far enough, but I find her head and shoulders among all but one other candidate, and none of that has anything to do with gender as far as…

I have gone back over Warren’s section of the forum as well as looking at the Inslee plan again. I still have reservations about her going from no plan to Inslee, but I also admit I agree with what you’ve said about her adoption. I think my hesitancy in large part has to do with the overall philosophy/framework that…

We are fundamentally different people, you and I.

Who tf said she’s too shill? I have liked Warren for years. If anything, what I have liked best is when she took it to people who needed taking to. I cheer her every time she does that, and her treatment of the financial industry has made CSPAN the equivalent of deep therapy many a time.

I’ll give the subject some more thought, but do you really not find it weird at all that her campaign had nothing to add or modify to the plan? That someone who is lauded for her comprehensive planning capacity in effect had nothing substantive to say on the issue until one of the candidates dropped out and they…

I don’t think she’s a do-nothing. I also don’t lump her in with Centrists. I believe she wants to do good, and I believe she has both competence and intelligence. I think she’s wrong that prodding private industry is going to do remotely enough in anything like the time we need. I think the evidence against that comes…

Testify.

This is a case where technically correct is in fact not the best kind of correct. It is not as good as being correct in spirit. The dude indicated that he didn’t want an SUV. We all know this. Trying to hook things on a grammatical technicality is actually not correct.

Oh no! I got my Lee Ermey characters mixed up! What a victory you scored!

And respectfully I respond that not putting effort into one’s own plan (or even enough to make a hybrid plan) is a huge warning sign that she wasn’t taking this issue remotely seriously enough. She really had nothing sustantive to add or modify to Inslee’s plan? She had nothing on her web site’s section on policies…

Wow, a Full Metal Jacket reference! You definitely put me in my place.

I can’t argue with your analysis, but it’s a major sign to me that she’s not serious on the subject. I like Elizabeth Warren. Like, not love. I think she’s principled and intelligent, and I think she will improve things. Just not remotely enough for what we need to survive.

Once again you have nothing. That’s going to be on your tombstone.

Lonely because nobody can stand you, huh? Don’t worry, little buddy, we’ve got room for your sad, tomato ass.

It was a great performance, but just grabbing Inslee’s plan the day of the CNN special is one of the most jaw-droppingly lazy things I’ve ever seen, considering this is the number one existential dilemma faacing us. I mean, did her campaign do zero work on a climate change plan?