I don’t actually understand what you saying with your sentences. Your point is not clear to me. So I can’t go ahead unless you are actually hoping for me to make mistakes to offend you. I don’t actually want to to do that, so no.

I really don’t understand what you are trying to say in this response, so I don’t want to make any assumptions. Could you please clarify?

So do I, if that’s what how a transwoman wants and asks to be seen. I hope for others to feel similarly and occasionally argue to others why I think it’s the more worthwhile view to take when it seems like that argument could be helpful. But how is it okay think you can declare how everyone else should look at the…

Jesus Christ, what a stupid thing for Jones to say. I feel for him. He must feel desperate because it can’t be good to have something you worked on crapped on before it even debuts. And I assume this will impact negatively the careers of more people who worked on it than just him. So I can understand him defending it.…

I would love for Vaughn to film a Superman story informed by Morrison’s and Morales’ Action Comics.

Star Wars is head and shoulders above those other titles. Vader is also great. The others not bad but nothing really memorable.

California cannot stand on its own for at the very least two reasons.

The last paragraph of the post you are commenting on is all about why not. The post itself already addressed the use of “my state pays for yours” theme. The post clearly answered your question.

Barring the fact that many critics of comic book franchises are, in fact, comic book fans themselves, saying “It’s for the fans” assumes that fans hold themselves to different (i.e. lower) standards than other viewers.

I think what you’re referring to as muscular for the men is actually every bit as much about “sexiness” as much as the women’s appearance as presented is for them. I don’t think one is neutral and the other objectification.

but standards have changed for both genders

A lot of comic fans have burnt into their minds a hyper-particular look and feel to the characters they like, canonizing one or a few creators’ takes on those characters as the “real” version. But it’s nothing more than a personal taste.

This looks fantastic. I know it’s just a trailer, but it hits everything: great Diana, great Amazons, a great Steve Trevor, and fun and mythic action and settings with lovely design, especially the WWI framing with all that brings. What they’ve shown of the new WW in BvS and these trailers feels like a great take on…

Hell yes to this.

Well, she definitely didn’t in the original comics by Marston, which I think are still by far the most artistically worthwhile and interesting of any version to this day, even if they are bizarre.

Too-SHAY! Many, many stars to you.

True. I’m not using those to indict Wonder Woman or Captain Marvel or anything they put out now. I’m cautiously optimistic for WW. “Cautiously optimistic” is my new “it’s going to be awesome!”

That was my thought. Although they clearly didn’t care enough to paint the pants purple and the skin green! ;)

“different from what we’ve seen before.”

DC already made Catwoman, so their “lap” happened a long time ago. And man did it suck. Then Marvel made Elektra, as if to prove their lap could suck just as much.