This sounds like grownup Georgia Nicolson and I love it.

Yeah, I'm with her on that. I just hate how she degraded him. Like, maybe he won't make decisions because he knows that she can be so harsh.

I think that the way the LW describes her situation is problematic, but sometimes "wearing the pants" just means that you're the one that has to make every decision, and that's exhausting.

Sure, part of the time is devoted to kid wrangling, but are a few things I'd like you to consider. Your low maintenance look is natural and cool now. In a few years it will be considered sloppy. People will let you know, in ways that are subtle and sometimes direct.

Let's see. It takes me at least 15 minutes just to dry my hair, even if I skip showering and just wet my hair down a bit to get rid of the bedhead (If I shower we can add 15 minutes for showering and an extra 10 minutes for fully wet hair to be dried.). Flat ironing/styling is another 10 (I have lots of hair - even at…

I was never taught how to do my hair or makeup, so I just... don't. Sometimes I wonder if it's holding me back at work, especially when the other women around me are perfectly groomed and styled. But at the same time, I can get out of bed and out the door in ten minutes flat.

Ooh, a hae about a black wheelchair bound transwoman? I need to play this game! Oh, it doesn't exist. You are literally whining about something that does not exist. Your life must be difficult.

So what do they want?

(respectfully)-

It's also pretty hard to say your goal is "ethics" when your go-to tactic is rape threats.

I'm going to guess that you're a white male under the age of twenty-five. If I'm wrong, then you should be aware that you sound like a white male under the age of twenty-five, which I absolutely mean as an insult, having once been a white male under the age of twent-five.

A reviewer disliked the sexual innuendo in the game and marked it down because he felt it affected his enjoyment of the game. Apparently that was grounds for a #GG rage fest. Unfortunately there tends to be a pattern that indicates that a lot GG'ers equate 'journalistic corruption' with 'they have a different…

There was a simmering anger about people like me — "Social Justice Warriors", as they call us — who are asking for change in the game industry: a better, broader representation of characters, among other things. We're "the cancer that's killing games", and Kotaku is seen as the key enemy site, with Polygon a close…

There was no 'GamerGate', there was no movement, there was not a huge outcry.

It also takes two minutes to understand that the originating event behind all of this was some jilted ex's sleazy gossip, but instead of saying "this is none of my business" and running away from it or (even better) directing their scorn at the party who aired his dirty laundry in public, a bunch of Internet…

Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.

What strikes me about the doxxing comment I saw was that it was posted as a weird, fucked up way of reassuring Felicia Day—their assertion was that the info was easy to find, so all her fears were silly. And it's just such ridiculous logic. Here's someone being vulnerable, and that's how you respond?

Not trying to make light of this topic, but this is how I read the title, TWICE:

It's almost as if they are suggesting institutional tolerance of rape is to blame, and not the women who provoke their attackers by drinking and/or wearing suggestive clothing/shoes/accessories/expressions.

How is "you don't have to touch people you don't want to touch" dysfunctional?