A lot of this articles sentiment about what IBM has produced is no different than most of the coverage on any of their products, except when we realize what these products actually created in society in the future...

We know where this is all going...

I love the “idea” of the Miata, but the the current styling just doesn’t work for me. I love the FR roof, but I find the back-end too high now and the nose too low. It looks oddly proportioned. The lines of the Fiat 124 works far better for me, but no hardtop option.

Price is all I care about (and likely everyone out there who wants a BMW Supra).

Kits in Japan for it...

The pricing and spec for the Ranger in Canada makes absolutely no sense. We ONLY get 4x4 and crewcab. Compared to Domestic 4x4, the Ranger is a bargain with a similarly spec’d Colorado coming in at Lariat prices, but without a 4x2 the other domestic and foreign beat the Ranger by 7-8 grand. Foreign manufacturers have…

I think this is Suzuki bowing out not because they couldn’t develop an engine, but because they cannot afford to and few people were interested in a dinosaur of hyperbike. Kawasaki had no issues getting the Ninja ZX14R’s big engine too meet Euro 4 while providing updated styling and hyperbike tech.

If I was a billionaire I’d just start the “whatever you f’ing want” series... The best wins... Here’s your track, go fast and win... that’s all we want to see.

You can see the concepts language translated far more into the RSX years later,

Ronin had so so many great and accurate points to the car chase scenes, but the horrible CGI skid smoke

The connected tail light had been an American car language for decades.

Oh for the days when this was a big truck....

No, the Isuzu Vehicross what way ahead of its time for both real off-road credibility and styling... you can essentially see Juke and Jeep Cherokee in its design... 20 years ago. The way the CUV market is going, Ford Edge ST or RS might be the true successor to the Vehicross.

Yeah, a Model X’s range does not stack up to what Bentley sells. A Mulsanne will get a conservative 640km range on a tank of gas while the Model X has a 200km deficit. A Model X is not a Mulsanne in any respect and I understand fully why Bentley cannot achieve their range with current tech.

Thats why you need a Mercedes convertible with Airscarf... for those arctic sunny days.

Not to be that guy, but the only indication that you COULD surmise that this was for a mid engine car was the hood (frunk) release button. The rest of the buttons look like your standard corvette key fob. 

For the first time in North America it will be AWD, Japan has had an all wheel 3 for a few years now.

Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances

Not a great acronym GM