Because that’s not what the juror said. Someone changed his statement. Actual quote:

is using UE cheating to make a game?  what is this I don’t even

It’s just as fun as watching the “love” elon drones.

Is your life improved by defending a billionaire?

I, too, want Elon to french-kiss me for defending him on Kotaku.

WOLVES HUNT IN PACKS, ARISEN 

DD1 is the textbook definition of a diamond in the rough.

YES. YES. HELL YEAH. YES. HELL. YEAH. YES. MASTERWORKS ALL, CANT GO WRONG. YES.

“How could they, after listening to three and a half weeks of testimony about how I was an un-credible person, not...believe a word that came out of my mouth?”

He’s going to be really upset when he hears about this new western lib fanservice anime featuring gender bending as its central plot point:

Ahahaha, you really think a random piece of merchandise is more canonical than the actual manga? Yeah, you’re not grasping at straws at all.

I do find the notion of a fan of anime and manga calling gender bending content “western propaganda” quite amusing.

Dude, official sources from outside of the manga have been wrong before. At some point they confirmed that Shanks was a Yonkou when he met Luffy, turned out that was proven wrong in the manga. I’m not saying Yamato will end up as a confirmed guy for the rest of the story, I don’t think it’s Oda’s intention either. But…

Fuck yeah.

Yeah I knew Ashley Johnson more recently from Blindspot, a goofy FBI procedural that ended a year or two ago. She was the science geek and her on-screen dad was Bill Nye playing himself. It was dumb and fun!

Nope. Listen, I’ve loved Diablo from day 1, played Hellfire, used to wake up before school to grind for runes in D2, and enjoyed D3 post auction house, but there is no way in hell I’m downloading Immortal. Yeah, I could play for free, but number of downloads is still a metric Blizzard uses; number of “potential…

The author concludes with a lukewarm it’s complicated and a metaphorical shrug emoji while saying that they might be wrong.  I am agreeing that they are wrong.

The title is actively encouraging people to take the first hit for free and risk getting sucked in though. Like you see the problem but you’re still flippant about steering people into harm’s way. I understand where you’re coming from—I played the game and didn’t spend anything either. And if I wrote about games…

I absolutely am in favor of banning gambling, since it’s a behavior which preys on the average person’s poor understanding of statistics (as well as certain exploitable aspects of human psychology) and it has no positive impact of which I’m aware.

This is a terrible take.