+1 positive rape kit, taped admission of lack of consent, police photos of the savage bruising, and a massive, on the record, pay out to get her to refuse to testify. The lack of a conviction in no way changes the fact he raped the woman.
Dude, you talk like you’ve never seen a hockey game. There are dopes that put 20 goals a year in, and you call them goal scorers because of how they play the game. Again: Gretzky, Wayne; not a goal scorer as per his own self estimation. I dare you to walk into the next hockey rink you pass and try to convince the lads…
No, it’s not. That’s the whole point. Guys have an ethos, or feel for how the game should be played. It’s different for every player, but obvious when you watch a guy play. And broadly speaking everyone falls into a few simple categories. It’s why the terms exist in the first place. How you play the game, who you are,…
I’ve never once, in any way, indicated Jagr didn’t score in bunches. He’s an all time great. But calling the man a goal scorer is wildly inaccurate. He was a puck possetion winger, who tried to generate offense primarily off the cycle using his his and stick handling to draw in defenders so he could dish to his…
Fascinating. Could you please, in equation form, using an equality, compare his assist and goal totals from that Olympic year? There must have been something I missed.
Not really. Too much goes into that product for me to believe that to be true. It’s like the whole, that artist writes their own lyrics pitch. If it were true, and mattered I wouldn’t need to be told.
Perhaps this is pedantic, and therefore unnecessary, but neither Lindros nor Jagr were pure scorers, let alone the best in the game. Off the top of my head: Bure, Selanne, Bondra, Palfy, Leclair, and probably Tkachuk could each have made a case that year for a title like that. But Jagr and Lindros were always pass…
They do get regular pay cheques, just like you or I. The pay periods vary by sports leauge, but the term is always the length of the season. In the NFL they get weekly game cheques, in the NHL it’s biweekly.
Plus you can just buy the 64Gb 8+ and pop in a terabyte of external storage.
I guess this is old enough that I should know about it, and maybe that’s why it’s getting no love from the commentariat, but sweet baby jesus! This is the actual killing all the deadspin headlines are facetiously describing. I think I lost minutes off my life from the embarraghter. That dude never left his house…
Goldjerrygold.gif
Jesus. Now I’m stuck with the thought that you may, in fact, wander the real world and just bark the word wrong at people. He commented it was the worst onside kick HE’D EVER SEEN. Stop being the kind of person that comments “Wrong”, it’s gross.
Hey, um, this is a little weird... But I just got a phone call from 1998, asking for you? We must have very similar phone numbers. Anyway, feel free to read up on how or why a style of play like Karlson’s prevents more goals that it allows but controlling the puck and pushing the game into the other teams end. His…
How is the misunderstanding the headline’s fault? Rodriguez is clearly the subject of the independent clause. He’s the one doing the grabbing. Consequently that makes him the subject of the dependant clause, and the one with the nickname.
Like Kylo Ren vs inanimate objects.
Dude had that grin on from the coin toss to the finish. It was bizarre.
Proof Rick and Morty fans are the worst. He didn’t even site his source!
See kids? This what happens if you eat your crab legs.
You need to expand your horizons friend. The odd man advantage is the most exciting 2 minutes in the game.