We are in the midst of one of those periodic collective uproars that demonstrate that a surprising number of people employed in the field of journalism are not actually all that in favor of reporting.

True, but you know, of course Ashley Feinberg is a pen name for King Kong Bundy.

A very reasonable argument.

I had never even heard of Elena Ferrante until now, so congratulations to her defenders; mission accomplished.

There are ways to engage symapthy. Then their are ways to enourage people to not be sympathetic to your causes.

As a recent Brown grad (and someone currently employed in the legal profession) I actually loved that he burned Brown students for their letter writing campaign (which teetered on the edge of harrassment). If we as student activists are serious about improving both university and legal procedures for addressing sexual…

I know NASCAR markets themselves as the Good Ol’ Boys from the South of Racin’. The series was born there and its mostly managed from there, but it is in reality Corporate America run. Multi-million dollar teams owned by billionaire captains of industry racing their rolling billboards around the track for…

That smacks of the violent video game, heavy metal music gateway-drug theories which sound good but don’t correlate. People have the ability to distinguish between virtual violence and real violence. Those who can’t have much bigger problems.

Maybe NASCAR refuses to work with Mr. Cox not because he is black but because they think he may be crazy.

*elicit

“Opponents argue that drawn child porn will only whet the pedophile’s appetite, and is the start of a slippery slope to real-life abuse. There’s not enough research to know who’s right.”

To me it seems like a slippery slope towards thoughtcrime. The notion that it could be illegal for someone to draw a picture and then…

I think that’s the question at play here: They are artificial constructs built for a purpose, and therefore incapable of consent. But at what level does that requirement for consent begin? How advanced does an artificial representation of a person need to be before it’s willingness to participate matters.

When Harvey claims he found out that Cox’s protest plans would put the underprivileged children he purported to help in harm’s way on a busy street

One person standing up to a despotic army is worlds braver than holding hands to block rush hour traffic.

Could’ve saved everyone a lot of trouble if they’d looked at his name: anyone who is “the Third” or “III” is The Worst.

“Isn’t it all sexual assault?”

It’s people like this that truly undermines legitimate campaigns for change.

Someone’s looking to win the litigation lottery.

“ potential sponsorships away from his minority-focused team and towards established, white-owned teams instead.” I don’t know why any sponsors would be hesitant to associate their hard-earned names and reputation with this fine litigious fellow.

I like what the Judge wrote there. He’s on point completely.