I’d like to know why you think I have anything to do with this article and why you think my name is Julianne.

So what you’re saying is that she’s not, in fact, a true Scotsman?

It’s interesting your source on Stein having “terrible, terrible vaccination views” cites a source (from four years ago!) just says that your employer shouldn’t get to choose, based on religious opposition, that you shouldn’t be permitted to have vaccinations. What’s terrible about that position? Do you think Hobby…

If you believe that an opinion being popular doesn’t make it right, why do you keep referring to how popular an opinion is in order to justify it being acceptable? I don’t care that a majority of Democrats are unwilling to take a principled stand. Restrictions on abortion access based on timing or age and attempts to…

Do you believe an opinion being popular makes it right?

What’s “good” about restrictions on certain types of abortion, parental consent requirements, and so-called informed consent? There’s a reason NARAL gave his state an F when he was in charge.

Given his stated positions and the bills he has signed into law and the 100% ratings he has received, it’s clear the ratings are either effectively meaningless or do not at all address the issues we’re discussing. Digging for them seems like a worse use of your time than digging for what he actually believes and what…

Laws of that nature have been enacted on his watch. His state got a failing grade from NARAL while he was in office. Do you think things like that matter, or are you willing to dismiss it based on these 100% scores? Clinton and Kaine have both expressed willingness to curb access to abortion in certain cases and…

Do you think restrictions on certain types of abortion, parental consent requirements, and so-called “informed consent” laws are a danger to abortion rights? Are you only concerned with, as you put it, women’s abortion rights, and not abortion rights for all?

Why do you think they do that, given his track record?

It’s weird that you’d specifically mention her by name, drawing attention her connections to Clinton, rather than simply naming the organization.

Assuming that’s not the reason, why do you think they give him perfect ratings despite repeatedly making such oppressive decisions while in office?

Being devoutly religious and using that as excuse to repeatedly oversee the state’s execution of its citizens and to come up with anti-choice legislation should disqualify someone from receiving support from the left.

Then you don’t understand what that phrase means.

I care if anybody is pro-life.

What?

This strategy you’ve now adopted is an even worse one than the one where you repeat stories that are based around something that’s literally the opposite of true.

Run with me, Timothy. Run with me. Run with me! Run with me!

You choose to take a misstatement of facts as a way to shut people up?

Then why say something that’s straight up not true?