Not yet, no. Bills have to pass through the Senate and gain royal assent before they’re law, remember?

Prostate cancer has never received more funding than breast cancer, so it kind of does matter that your anecdote doesn’t make any sense. Stick to ones that do and your point will be made more strongly.

Can you actually cite an example of someone saying “no, black lives matter” in response to someone saying “all lives matter”?

And here’s one of them!

Because if she spells it out, her kids won’t know what she’s talking about. They’re... not very bright.

I’ve already seen radfems rallying behind the Republicans on this cause. They really hate porn and trans people, that could easily get them to turn a blind eye on abortion.

You’re right, they can! However, they like her enough to endorse her and to run a bylined column which points out how she did something stupid. Do you understand the difference between these two things? Do you understand that recognizing someone’s mistakes and weaknesses isn’t hatred?

They hate her so much that they endorsed her!

Again, I’m not referring to Americans having their rights violated. An actual real life Canadian had his human rights violated over and over, over the course of a decade, starting when he was a minor, based largely on decisions made in US courts. So have dozens of other people from all over the world. How does…

Omar Khadr is a Canadian, stop pretending American judges don’t make decisions that affect people that aren’t American, xenophobe.

I mean, it’s only one thing among many that’s indicative of the way he views prisoners’ rights, but that he came down on the side of the government when they were arguing they should be allowed to search the dicks of Guantanamo detainees before they’re allowed to see their lawyers, one of whom described it as “a…

Maybe not “our” rights, but if she lets Garland’s nomination stand, the rights of lots of other people will be trampled all to hell.

Do you really want to use the phrase “final solution”? Do you understand what that evokes?

No, I never said anything about Clinton supporters actually voting for McCain. What I said was that “so many Clinton supporters were saying [emphasis added] they’d vote for” McCain. You can actually scroll up and see for yourself or just click the link in this comment to my original one. Perhaps you confused me with…

Nobody said they did vote for McCain. You’re now arguing (“20% of Clinton supporters did NOT vote for McCain”) against a claim that wasn’t made, whereas before you were arguing (“no Clinton supporter said that”) against a claim that was made that was actually correct.

That’s a very good question! But it’s secondary to the point because I was responding to the claim that “they didn’t” like those ideas. They very much do! Single payer healthcare and affordable education are, while less popular than any sensible person would think they should be, very popular. The idea that Sanders…

What? Lots of Clinton supporters said that they’d vote for McCain. Do you simply not remember what was said in 2008?

So you don’t know what autism is. Okay!

Or that the presumed nominee all along insisted that these things are “impossible” when they are not, thus crushing their hope for a future where they can have basic things that other countries have. Again, Democrats wanted these things to come to pass. Then they were told they can’t have them and they listened.

That so many Clinton supporters were saying they’d vote for a ticket that had Sarah Palin’s name on it shows that they didn’t have a shred of sanity.