inappropriateresponses
You might be wrong.
inappropriateresponses

Incrementalism sounds great to people who are already personally comfortable.

Which votes make you like Clinton more than Sanders? Was it the one about going to Iraq? The USA PATRIOT Act? The $700 billion bailout program? The one about building a fence on the border with Mexico?

Yes, lobster was cheap. What’s your point?

What? Can you point to where I’ve made that argument?

Can you point to where anyone said lobster isn’t cheap?

“Nothing is the same as it used to be” is a statement that is as utterly meaningless as it is true.

Do you genuinely not understand the difference between inflation and changing tastes? Hamburger did not go from being seen as disgusting prison food to being seen as fancy chartered airplane food. Lobster did.

If you think lobster is fancy, you’ve been duped.

The pacing of the matches in the games has always been terrible and will continue to be terrible as long as the player is competing against the computer or another player. The pacing of good wrestling matches is good because it’s deliberate and cooperative. If a game allowed one player to call spots and both to carry

What? What does that have to do with video games?

The single best thing WWE could do with their video games is acknowledge that wrestling is fake. That they still present the matches as competitive rather than cooperative is ridiculous.

Nobody knows what TNA is.

How many times do I need to have someone explain to me that they think she’s great by saying she’s better than Trump before someone realizes that that doesn’t mean anything? Being better than worst is not enough to qualify someone as great.

I’m not suggesting anyone only vote for a perfect candidate.

Accepting Democrats doing things that are wrong because they’re not more wrong than Republicans is exactly why Democrats get candidates who do things that are wrong. They face no consequences.

Again, auditors are not tasked with enforcing rules. And where are you getting that they knew about this before this particular audit? Which previous audit did they conduct that discovered what happened in the past?

I don’t care if she can be prosecuted. It’s pretty relevant that someone who wants to be in charge of the entire executive branch knowingly broke a rule of procedure. I don’t care about Republicans’ obsessions. Her presidential aspirations should be destroyed! She’s a bad candidate!

It’s not just that she’s wanted to be president for years, it’s that she’s expected to be president for years, so she figured breaking a rule here or there wouldn’t get in her way.

That’s not how auditing works. Auditors don’t enforce rules and don’t act preemptively.

Something being legal and it having been done before doesn’t make doing it right.