Losers infiltrating the State Department’s auditing staff just to oppress women and get free college educations. Sad!

It’s almost as if auditors can only find violations of the rules after they’ve occurred!

No, he’s not. Perhaps you’re confusing him with Craig Ferguson?

You really don’t know what burden of proof means, do you?

Can you point out where I’ve said someone should vote for any particular candidate? Like, even one instance of me doing that?

That’s not how burden of proof works at all. Again, it is on the one making a claim to prove it is true, not the one having a false claim made about them to prove it is false.

Which of Sanders’ supporters have said she will lose because of name calling? Like, can you point to anyone doing this?

Reducing opiate use is dramatically different from “stop[ping] pain patients from getting medication”.

No, seriously, why does it matter if it doesn’t work?

If baseless name calling is ineffective, why are you bringing it up? Why does it matter that he hasn’t faced it (which he most certainly has from many Clinton die hards) if facing it has no effect?

Okay, but these are the same people who think Obama is both an atheist and a Muslim when he’s actually a latecomer to Christianity the same way that, for example, George W. Bush was. That someone stupid thinks something is true doesn’t make it true.

So you genuinely believe those people were going to kill her? Weird.

No, the burden is on you to name which ones were.

Being to the left of someone on an issue doesn’t mean you’re taking a leftist stance. What specifically leftist stances are you saying Clinton has?

I’m not telling anyone how to feel. I’m asking how you feel! Which of these people do you feel were making credible threats?

I asked if you could cite Sanders saying that racial justice is just economic justice and you cited him saying general economic issues are general economic issues.

I dismissed you because you admitted to not taking it seriously. I don’t know why you’d try to lie about the timeline when nobody else can see it.

Oh, so you’re just fucking with me instead of adding to the discourse. Got it.

Well, now it’s just confusing why you’re using it.

Sorry for the confusion, but I wasn’t talking about independents, I was talking about centrists like Clinton apologists. I took “both sides” to mean left and right, rather than Democrats and Republicans. It’s true that there’s little reason for independents to support her, though.