I’d hardly call 44 hp “spritely” except maybe in an Austin Healey Sprite. That’s a little more than half of my old 84 Subaru’s HP. And no one ever describe that car as spritely. Fine in a European city where torque matters more but a slow, slow deathtrap on US highways.
I fully agree with this statement. Pick a date that is too soon, MFG’s scramble and we have jokes like the i-Miev everywhere. Pick a date that is too far into the future and MFG’s don’t take it seriously enough. I’d bet on 2040 being picked as a date which gives enough time to get it right. That gives me enough time…
I’ll bite, I have no interest in EV’s if that would be the template. I won’t spend my money on a glorified golf cart. Not that those $25K EV’s will only have 44hp...but if that’s case...hell no.
We also urge you to set a date by which new sales of fossil fuel vehicles will end entirely...
Put on that turbo that Subaru refuses to add and Robert’s your father’s brother.
Middle Eastern people are considered part of the Caucasian population period
They should try that line when they get pulled out of the airport security line for that “extra check” and see how that goes over.
If selling that SUV enables Aston to continue to make their cars, then by all means...sell those 90 a month.
You don’t want to dump your damprid all over a tile floor. Ask me how I know!
helped put that formerly great magazine out of business.
I’d believe their top spec cars (911 Turbo, 911 GT3/GT2, Panamera Sport Turismo Turbo) should stay ICE for the near long term (through 2030-2035). They have the Taycan that can fill the EV performance spec. No need for the others to follow suit just yet.
Onboard Peter Egan and I’ll be in car writer heaven.
My goodness...I haven’t read a Jamie Kitman post in years.
This is the correct take and the reasoning I follow.
That’s quite a few containers and some serious money to ship them halfway around the world.
Go to the store, pass background check, purchase rifle and ammunition. It’s not hard, at least outside of DC.