I’d love to, but I’m not allowed out without my male chaperon.

Nah. It just means Splinter thinks a doll wearing a physical representation of patriarchial female repression is somehow aspirational for little girls.

There is nothing inspirational about wearing clothes specifically made to erase women from public discourse. On the plus side, it will teach little western girls to maintain their modesty for Allah and Ken. /s

If you think women being forced to wear headscarves is a better future, I’m not sure what to say. We shouldn’t be pitching the erasure of women in public as aspirational to little kids.

Mattel: You can be anything you want as long as you maintain your modesty for Allah and Ken only.

Hijab Barbie. Illustrating that even little girls can grow up to be chattel! Much Progressive. Very woke.

If they were celebrating achievements, they’d make a Barbie of whichever woman won the Olympics for fencing. They are celebrating her because she is proud to wear a repressive symbol of patriarchial ownership.

It’s systemic about how shitty other countries are. We have set immigration limits because it isn’t possible to integrate the amount of immigrants that want to come in any given year. Not integrating new immigrants means they don’t have full access to society. In some cases, this could result in radicalization. In…

Moral crimes don’t exist Jack. Just crimes. Those are based on mutually agreed upon laws by the citizens and representatives of a sovereign nation. We’ve decided via choice or apathy that we don’t want illegal immigrants in the country. Your moral outrage is irrelevant. Almost nobody wants an open borders policy.…

Nope. They are completely different. Every country in the world has an immigration policy.

It seems like both.

If every man of a certain age has done so, then clearly you have also done so, otherwise, you wouldn’t speak in absolutes. I look forward to you turning yourself in to the appropriate authorities to face justice.

It is obvious that it can and does exist without geopolitical struggle as various terrorist are from places where the US never/the West never interfered. They aren’t evil, at least not within their system of belief. In fact they are the complete opposite based on their belief system.

You are the type of male feminist that probably uses the label as a cover to sexually assault and harass women.

How would this be better understood “in community” unless the community actually does exist for hating men?

It is the same or ostensibly better only in that getting drugged substantially helps the victims case vs getting the victim pass out drunk.

That’s a dumb take. You’d just be the only side taking losses. The other side isn’t just motivated by geo-politics, but also ideology and that ideology demands (by the interpretation of terrorists) the spread of it via violence.

Because any article you write about yourself in a positive light will help your branding.

Nah. Italian design is the best, as long as Germans are doing the building.

How does one out someone who one doesn’t know is gay?