Wow, you really are a moron. That situation wouldn’t be an issue of self-incrimination anymore, because he would have already confessed to the crime, so compelling him to unlock the encryption is not violation of the 5th amendment.

Volvo’s philosophy towards its development of autonomous technology mirrors the automaker’s dedication to safety.

You’re half right. It doesn’t matter if he’s guilty of anything else.

Already been ruled on, albeit not at the amendment level. See link near the end of the article

Because refusal to comply with an illegal and unconstitutional demand is adequate evidence of guilt to incarcerate someone.......moron....

Yes, you missed that part.

and until the feds can scrounge up enough evidence to prove it in court, or at least formally charge him of it, they should let him go

Because not letting someone babysit your kids is the same as keeping someone in solitary confinement. I wouldn’t let you babysit my kids either, so why don’t you lock yourself up in prison?

Did you not read the article at all? hey specifically linked the ruling which states that it does fall under 5th amendment protection:

Credulity be damned. There is no DA’s side. There is the law’s side. And the law says, if the DA can’t come up with enough evidence to even charge this guy of a crime, much less convict him of it, he should go free, on principle. They should make it easy, because that’s the fucking law.

No, because there’s no constitutional amendment against self-vindication.
That’s idiotic. Your instincts don’t matter. The guy’s guilt or innocence is irrelevant. You’re not supposed to side with him. You’re supposed to side with some of the underlying principles that form our legal system. Specifically:

That’s like the “I’m not a terrorist so who cares if the NSA spies on me?” argument. The answer being, yes, yes it is that bad. Because it undermines our entire legal system, and says something that categorically is not ok on principle can be violated depending on the outcome, which then renders said principle void.

I would recommend moving that innocent-until-proven-guilty motherfucker out of jail and back home, since he is innocent-until-proven-guilty, and unless you actually charge him of a fucking crime why the fuck should he be in prison? Maybe they should lock you up in the general prison population as a pedophile.

Or maybe he isn’t, maybe he has some other illegal stuff on his computer that currently he isn’t even charged with, but turning over said encryption would be self incrimination for something nowhere as bad as child porn but still something that he’d rather not have on his record

And I bet, back in your day, you walked to school, up the hill barefoot in the snow, both ways.

Fortunately it’s not true, and has to do with the reason you need each type of crutch. From my reply to ararapompia:

That must be one of the most hilariously ridiculous conspiracies i’ve read recently. The truth is far more mundane, and far more practical.

Or, the bounty thing could make you think, “Hey, this guy who was fine with bounties sees a problem here. Maybe there really is a problem, and it’s gotten so out of hand that even this guy thinks it’s bad”

“...“ -Sean Payton, voice of reason compared to gun advocates

Nope. Won’t happen. Gun advocates who lose family to guns will simply think “if only my loved one had more guns, they could’ve killed the person who killed them first”