I love your name, because I love Carson McCuller and I love crullers (not that I’ve had one in like 35 years).

People should stop trying to make Jeremy Renner happen.

The Goddess of Cereals, gone evil!

Holy smoke, let it go.

objectively, of course.

whole lotta product in that hair.

I couldn’t agree with you more.

BLACK-OPS PERIOD CENTER

so much boohoo.

If human society had really evolved all that much, they would have eradicated Earl Grey as a legitimate form of tea.

I just saw Tin Man for the first time and was honestly moved, I forgot that TV could be like that.

You know he would, though.

The entire thread below can be summarized as follows:

I would please like to discuss it more, preferably IN CAPITAL LETTERS.

Also, given how played out/affected by diminishing returns/franchise fatigue the 80s-90s model of Trek was, why would you want to see a return to that when you can simply rewatch the better parts of that.

So that might* mean that this series is lousy, from that point of view, but I don’t see how it can compromise something that already exists.

I don’t know, but I have been asking myself (2) every time I read something on AV Club lately.

Fine, but in my totally subjective personal opinion that’s not as interesting for me or as inspiring for me or as good a framework to hang a story on as seeing those morals in action.

THAT PROPERTY IS TRANSITIVE

For me, a lot of the criticism being discussed here is too abstract. What is it specifically that compromises earlier parts of the Star Trek universe?