It isn’t about quality journalism it’s about getting you to click on the article. I did it. I probably have an addiction to garbage articles.

Just because it isn’t in DSM-5 doesn’t mean it wasn’t in earlier versions or that nobody is trying to get it included again. Even if you go to calling it a “control disorder” it’s not like it doesn’t exist or isn’t a problem that people face and just calling it “mental distress” at the end pretty well devalues anyone…

The middle seat gets both armrests.

Fuck this shit.

Yes. That is the way of the autogynephile.

They’re letting you use the computers at the nursing home today?

Gonna guess you don’t have kids, so let me break it down

Follow up lede: do average car buyers care about handling performance?

Uh, no.

“Do you care about performance?” lose 66% of people.

“Do you care about performance other than being able to go as fast on the highway and effectively pass cars?” 85% of people are gone now.

“Do you care about performance other than the engine…

I guess when crumple-zones, airbags, and seat belts became standard. Because the average car buyer should be much more concerned about safety than performance. If you read my other more mathematical approaches to emergency situations, you will understand that handling performance isn’t going to help much (if at all)…

All the time, and as I mentioned before, the performance of your car in this situation isn’t really going to matter. The stopping distance difference between a Chevy Spark (60-0, 127 ft) is not that different than the stopping distance of a 911 (60-0, 93 ft) considering both cars are traveling 88 ft/s and the human…

No surprise that hate speech could be heard on the 88 radio.

Then don’t make it so easy?

Fuck. Thank you. Stupid fucking Trump.

Clearly you are AWARE of these hazards, so drive accordingly.

I’m going to tell you right now, that if you drive responsibly, there is no situation where you should be reaching the limits of handling on any modern car. It’s called awareness while driving.

Sorry if this comes across dick-ish but it’s entirely a serious question: Where is the line between mansplaining and a male simply explaining something to a female? I understand the more severe cases such as talking down or giving unwanted advice, but countless times online and in media I’ve seem the term used when it…

Why isn’t it the same? Because he is a man and should enjoy when a woman pulls down his pants? Perhaps it was his fault for wearing sweatpants in the first play? She should face the same consequences that a man would if he pants a woman, plain and simple. 

Al Franken lost his seat on the senate for very very VERY much less than that. The #MeToo movement have painted themselves into a corner, arguing that mere juvenile, stupid, ill-advised (and often drunken) behavior is indistinguishable from being an actual sociopath predator.

She pulled down pants and underwear, penis was exposed.

She also kissed a male contestant on American Idol who said he’d never been kissed. No consent, no apology, just treated like a joke. That was his first kiss, damn it.