What about the women on the other side of these footballers? For some reason, these women never use birth control with footballers. Their thought process seems simple to me, guy with a big paycheck comes in and doesn’t feel like using a condom.

Eh, they can do whatever they want. It’s a brie country, after all.

And 100% of men in all professions have been told the same.

Their ethnicities? I’d go out on a limb and assume everyone involved was American.

I’ve seen people tearing the father to shreds for leaving when commanded (by gun). I know that it’s a tragically difficult scenario to imagine, and people’s instincts are to stay with their children no matter what, but who knows what would’ve happened if he stood his ground? At least this way he was able to leave and…

Seriously? Has Russell Wilson’s faith ever hurt anyone? I mean, if that’s going to be your criteria for deciding who to root for, I think the choice between a guy who beats a child and a guy who is a little too pious is pretty easy...

THESE VIKINGS I CALL THEM JULIUS CAESAR BECAUSE THEIR HOPES AND DREAMS JUST ENDED ON A BRUTAL SHANKING.

Also, Canada has women in its infantry for crying out loud. Which reminds me....

Hollywood is afraid of geniuses. That’s why he didn’t win for those superb movies.

I mean, wouldn’t all they need is for Ambrosia to testify that she was, indeed, uncomfortable?

I agree with you, I Kinjad. It was a stunning movie. And Leo doesn’t have to say much verbally in a movie; it’s called Acting.

True, but the kernel of truth that propels this bullshit train is that Hillary is no more attuned to the everyday realities of families by virtue of being a woman than she is more emotional by virtue of being a woman.

See I actually thought Denzel was incredible in Training Day and The Departed is my favourite Scorsese film.

He should have won for Goodfellas. The fact that he lost to Kevin Costner is something my father still hasn’t recovered from. Goodfellas also should have been best picture - it’s an American classic.

He definitely should’ve won for Raging Bull. Bar None.

That seems to be the Academies M.O.: snub an actor for a brilliant performance, wait a few years, try to rectify the mistake by giving them an Oscar for an ok performance that isn’t the best out of the current nominees, thereby snubbing someone else more deserving, wait a few years, rectify THAT mistake by giving them…

No, he deserved an Oscar for both “What’s Eating Gilbert Grape?” and “The Aviator”. If (*coughs*when*coughs*) he wins for the Revenant, I’ll treat this like I treated Denzel Washington’s win for “Training Day”... I’ll pretend he won for one of his better performances (in Denzel’s case, “Malcolm X”).

In fact, the best thing for actual rape survivors is to be seen to go as far as legally possible against those who deliberately make false allegations. This tiny minority of accusers makes it much harder for other victims to be believed. If there’s a perception of there being a harsh punishment for deliberately false…

“ has ultimately had a negative effect on the way publications and institutions are willing to talk about rape and sexual assault.”

In the scenario, the lawyer sort of has to go scorched earth on the story, because the standard for winning a defamation case as a public figure/institution is pretty high.