CarPlay must not be all that important to GM customers considering GM set their own record revenue and profits in the fiscal year ending 6/30/24.

They are not in the business of making cars, they are in the business of making *money*. And trucks print money. Especially now that they don’t have to lose money on cars to be able to sell them without CAFE fines. Which was pretty much the only reason the Detroit three made cheap cars for decades.

Disagree.

Sounds like a pretty standard reach for a generation of click obsessed journalists. Journalistic integrity died ages ago, you’re just a byproduct - no hard feelings.

Edit - oh wait, you’re the same “Journalist” who pushed the whole carry on vs check your bag debate, good lord... find another career path

No. He said they are struggling to understand a single issue with the car on tracks where bumps and kerbs affect the race line. Car design is an exercise in compromises. The task is for them to understand what changes can be made to better the car on street circuits without giving back too much of their dominance on…

No he didnt.

It’s sad that Jalopnik’s coverage of F1 has trickled to almost nothing in the last few years. But it’s tragic that whenever we do get F1 coverage, it’s from this author. Who must hate F1. Or find it elitist. Or god only knows what. But every article Bradley writes about F1 is full of needless snark and poorly informed…

Misleading, clickbait headline. Have some pride in yourself and your work. 

lol as a person who used to sell insurance, this is so right

The campaign will be conducted in two phases. Due to unavailability of parts, the subject components will first be inspected. If the inspection shows no abnormality in the affected components, the vehicle can continue to be used without restriction. Customers will be notified again when the remedy parts are…

May be one of the most ill-informed articles from Jalopnik in a while, and that’s saying a lot. Yes there is a stop use order, but only until inspected. Porsche states the cars can be driven if inspected and found not to have the corrosion issue, which will be the vast majority of this small number of cars. There is…

You lack context. It was at night, the other boat didn’t have it’s lights on as they were stargazing. A tragic yet preventable accident, and she was found not guilty of a crime.

I’m not defending anyone, but I’m on the lake quite often and could easily see how this could happen.

Why take this approach towards your readers? We appreciate your articles, but I’m not sure Jalopnik is the last word in international trade and monetary policy. The commenter raises a reasonable point and your response is a dismissive “Sure bud?”

While I do not agree with this exactly. But do think we need to take a good hard look at vehicle imports from China and Chinese companies. How do you figure these tariffs would lead to “runaway inflation and joblessness”?

I mean it is actually a legit competitor and the two cars are very frequently cross-shopped, so yes.

This is an extraordinarily stupid statement on multiple levels.

$100k was probably the down payment. This was a weeks-long paint job that somehow involved replacement and alignment of several body panels AND brand new interior trimming AND hand-painted wheels AND a post-production retrofit of the Sky View roof panels, which involved removing the roof.

This topic does not seem very Jalopniky. 

I see quite a few around town and on my commute, not counting my wife’s sitting in our driveway.

I think it’s because Nissan is a very poorly run company. I mean, when an ex-CEO escapes interpol hidden in a suitcase, you know things are bad.