He also said something about the NFL paying proper taxes for once. It was for entirely the wrong reasons , but that’s 2 whole things I agree with him on.

It doesn’t matter whether, theoretically, that girl might have been a ludicrously amazing runner without the advantages that her fundamentally male body gave her, because that’s not what actually happened. Your argument is no different from, “well, Barry Bonds might have been an amazing batter without those steroids.…

Really ? because if all teams were co-ed there would be no girls on them. Or at least very very few. As long as they’re competitive they are going to pick the kids giving them the best chances to win so they are going to pick boys over girls almost every single time. Eliminating inter school competitions a different…

This all day. Having a family and a responsible job are all possible, but maybe not in the exact manner you want them. Want a big family? Maybe scale back the career. Want a big career? Maybe scale back the family. My old boss is a senior partner at a top global law firm. Her husband has a travelling career. They have…

your response was so measured I had to read it three times to make sure you weren’t being sarcastic. look, a unicorn - genuine discourse in the comment section!

When our first child was born, she was unplanned. My wife was becoming a teacher, that was her dream. After her maternity leave, I stayed home with our beautiful child. I delayed my career because we couldn’t do it all and have a child. I eventually got the career I wanted and wouldn’t change the delay for anything.…

You’re getting flamed for this but I agree. I know a woman, who was a secretary she wanted to do corporate law. Her husband said ok. He worked 4 jobs to put her through law school, they planned had kids so that she would take the bar and deliver around the same time. Then she got a job with waffle house, she makes…

The rigidity of the medical training path puts people (mostly women) in an incredibly (and unnecessarily, IMO) shitty position if you want to have a career and a family.

Mid-to-late 30s is absolutely the best time for anyone to have children, not just doctors. There’s a lot of growing up to do before you’re really deep-down fit to be a good parent.

This is actually the part of the article that I found a bit confusing - everyone I know is waiting to have kids until their early to mid-thirties. My parents had me when they were in their mid-thirties. It feels natural and obvious to me that you’d potentially wait that long, and I just feel like there’s something…

The point is that there may never be a good time. People choose their professions mostly. Along with making the decision to become a highly educated professional that has to spend a decade preparing for said profession comes choices as to what you can and cannot have. Sometimes these choices are hard, but they are…

I was just thinking that. If you look at the list, a good number of these women are, or were, A-list stars. The fact that none of them came forward out of fear of repercussions is indicative of how powerful Weinstein is (though now, hopefully, was).

Ashley Judd’s entire family is in show business. Her sister and mother a very famous musicians. No one was immune from this. Also, notice how quickly Paltrow’s career deteriorated after she stopped doing favors for Harvey. That’s with the Spielberg connection. Even now the best she can get is a supporting role in…

Asia Argento’s dad is Dario Argento. He is a pretty big deal in certain circles.

They would not be able to keep up with the sectarianism between social anarchists, anarcho-syndicalists, ancaps, anarcho-pacifists, green anarchism, and anarcho-primitivists, etc. Too many big words and not enough Stars and Stripes.

If you ever wanna have a real good (read: terrible) time, pick a Conservative-leaning Facebook page discussing all this and remind them that Robert E. Lee was a slaveowner and a traitor. You will learn real quick just what kind of history some people in this country have been taught. The way some people tell it, Lee…

Then you weren’t consuming 1000 calories. Before I started using trackers, I thought I was good at keeping a running tally in my head of what I was consuming during the day. I was very, very wrong. 30 pounds down since using a tracker to make myself stick to my limit.

You’re looking at this way too short term. It’s not out of the realm of possibility that you burn less than 1000 calories today if you’re a rather small framed individual with a sedentary lifestyle. Many people grossly overestimate the amount of calories they burn in the day.

Expending more calories than one consumes (i.e. a calorie deficit) is definitively the only way a living organism can lose weight. The OP literally couldn’t have been more factual if he said “2 + 2 = 4" and of course some jackbag has to rush to “disagree”.............WITH FACTS. Welcome to 2017, there is no such thing…

Water weight changes, water retention and starvation mode.