“[T]he end of Vanderpump Rules as we know it”.

But there is, as established in countless playground arguments, such a thing as infinity plus one.

I love all three of those. I quite like how ‘The Lobster’ is so visually drab compared to the ostentation of ‘Poor Things’.

Forget this, I want a show about a group of friends falling out after a screening of Tim Burton’s ‘Planet of the Apes’. (If any film could make people never want to see each other again, it would be that one.)

Sure. I think anti-authority stuff is great for kids, especially as they already understand bullies, and it’s good for them to understand that bullies in the adult world can easily turn into tyrants. I just don’t think they need to be grappling with the specifics of a sleazy, sexually predatory misogynist who I think…

“He is playing a character named “Eric,” who does not have a credited last name in the film. The post has been updated to reflect this. We regret the error.

Sure. If you want a kiddie film that says you shouldn’t let a populist, power-hungry egomaniac take power and run society into the ground through greed and incompetence, I’d put on ‘The Lion King’.

Even in the first film, I found it weird that Riley’s emotions are multi-gender but other people’s seem to strictly align with the gender of the person they inhabit. Unless Riley is a stealth gender-fluid character?

I wonder how nuanced they’re going to be distinguishing between anxiety the emotion (something we all feel from time to time) and anxiety the condition (a mental health issue that has huge effects on the way people who have it develop and function from day to day).

I guess they could have tried that, but that would require them knowing that the pandemic would have eased by 2021, which, from my memory, did not seem like a sure thing back then. And certainly at the time, with everyone stuck at home climbing the walls, having fresh new entertainment to watch via streaming was a…

I’m just thinking of it, and am I correct in saying there hasn’t been a villain in either Incredibles movie who has inherent powers? Obviously both Syndrome and Screenslaver were technology based, but Bomb Voyage and the Underminer both seemed to just use equipment, and i can’t think of any other villains we got a…

It’s a pretty strong theory, and it does line up with an attitude I remember people having towards Disney when I was a kid: “It’s always the same old story, a princess who wants love, a magical villain, some cute sidekick, yada yada.” Pixar broke the mold for a while, but even the “Imagine if [x] had feelings” jokes…

“What Pixar movies attempt to say anything whatsoever, no matter how subtle or metaphorical, about Cheeto/the MAGA movement?”

But it’s the Simpsons’ writers’ job to be repetitive. Their job. Being repetitive is their job.

Renner wants revenge on Blanc for allowing a bottle of his precious ‘Renning Hot’ hot sauce to be destroyed in the last caper.

I feel like I need to meditate on the Emma-Stone-dancing-in-a-car-park footage for some time and see what truths I can uncover in it.

“But I still like a real man.” Are we sure this isn’t Seinfeld’s coming out story?

“These reefers are making me angsty!”

I think it’s a balance. Yes, the act of adaptation requires change, for practical reasons if nothing else; a film or a TV show works differently than a book. But the concept should still be honoured, or else why bother adapting it? If the creator wants to “make the story their own” why not ... make their own story?…

‘2 Mo 2 Ana’.