This comment just furthers my belief that idiots think a prior conviction should bar future employment.

“Jim Nantz asks a question about a judge in North Carolina, Phil Simms does his best to steer the conversation back to football, and Diana Moskovitz says this is worth listening to.”

another reactive hot take from Batista Thumbs Up

And you needed TWO broken legs to understand! Where was your Jung-Ho Kang indignation?

Rule 7.09 (d) says nothing about intent.

He did! His earhole was uninjured though, unlike the shortstop’s leg.

The Pittsburgh Pirates lost their shortstop because of this rule interpretation. But you didn’t know that. Thanks for finally paying attention!

Nothing at all!

A strict interpretation of rule 7.09 (d) says that both slides are illegal. It’s not Utley’s fault the umpires have fucked up for so long

Utley didn’t write the rulebook, dude. You ever see the Marlon Anderson slide?

By this logic, every single takeout slide is illegal. You understand that, right?

Did you have any problem with Didi Gregorius sliding into Jose Altuve on Tuesday? I didn’t think so. The Gregorius slide was MUCH farther past the base.

Did Chase Utley break Jung-Ho Kang’s leg? Did Chase Utley interpret rule 7.09 (d)? Is anybody listening to me? Are there any horse socks?

HAHAHAH nobody gave a fuck when Jung-Ho Kang got injured. Thanks for finally paying attention, you dolts.

Remember when people weren’t reading websites that outed the sexuality of their rival websites’ executives? I miss those innocent days.

+1

Patrick Redford? Not sure, but he seems unusually interested in Greg Hardy’s dick.

this thread is pathetic

Ryan Mallett’s dad is Ryan Mallett?

My favorite thing was Hopkins getting his jersey yanked after the play, Hopkins instinctively reacted by tossing the ball at the defender, BUT O’Brien decided to throw Hopkins under the bus.