That is last years jersey. This year it says Rakatan, not Qatar Airway.

A vast supermajority of the tickets are purchased by corporations that use them for employee retention and client fluffing. The remainder are held by individuals who have held their tickets for decades. If for some reason an individual would relinquish his/her (really, his) tickets there are dozens of people chomping…

You don’t understand how Manhattan and the Knicks work. All the seats will always be sold.

Not at all. Watching Harden play is painful. He’s a great, effective player, but his lean ins for a foul make for atrocious viewing.

That’s wrong. If they wanted cost certainty, best move is buy out. Otherwise, old writers cut backloaded sweetheart deals with new employers leaving espn on hook for current contracts.

Mannix is an atrocious writer. He’s the tomato can of writers.

Pretty hard to take you seriously when you cite Broussard as a ESPN personality when he hasnt been there for months. You must be real tied in and an expert of this subject, huh?

By “make things happen”; do you mean allow a lay-up line to commence? Alternatively, do you mean “stop the ball”? Or shoot and do nothing else.

Nope. Ever hear of attempted murder? Just need intent and one act. Where is the victim in a DUI?

I’m not an MMA expert so I can’t comment on that analysis although it certainly doesn’t stop you from talking golf.

Do you realize how silly your statement is? Only one major (The Masters) is played at the same course every year so holding a scoring record (as measured against par) is a useless metric. In addition, technology, travel and course designs have changed so much that comparisons are useless. One thing is obvious, there…

No they can’t. Technology changes as do course designs. Not to mention travel much different and less taxing.

Obviously you’re too young to remember Jack Nicklaus.

I disagree. I dont think CP3 or Steph could make this pass bc their arms arent long enough. Look at the arm-length necessary to make that pass so as to get the requisite english and angle on the ball. CP3 is an amazing distributor of the rock, but physical limitations would not allow him to make THIS pass.

I hope YOU aren’t a lawyer. That’s why the judge instructed the jury that her testimony was ONLY relevant to damages, not liability. This is extremely common.

Exact opposite. Anecdotal < expert.

You don’t have to be a dr to determine if one has a fever. It just doesn’t carry the same weight as if a dr said so. Goes to how you weigh the evidence.

It wasn’t being proffered as an expert diagnosis.

Very hard to make judgments on a legal proceeding unless you are actually in attendance. Most civil suits are determined on which party the jury or judge finds more credible. Since we can’t see the demeanor of the witnesses we are just guessing. This is the typical he said (3x) she said it’s impossible for us to…

It’s liable or not liable then there are damages awarded if the Defendant is determined liable.