Second Life without the sex, so, um...nothing.
Second Life without the sex, so, um...nothing.
My Dyson may be the only overly expensive purchase that I’ve ever made that I’m 100% satisfied with.
They can say anything they want.
Are you serious?
Agreed. I like the idea of adding some crunchy texture, but on the fast food burgers they’re never crunchy by the time there’re eaten.
“If in the photo above the bun looks as if it’s got merely a burnt sienna brioche hue, that is your mind playing tricks on you”
I’m so over this.
The stop effing talking about it!!!
It’s wonderful that so many people seem to have so few real problems in their lives that they have the time and energy to get outraged over this.
One of the main reasons that The Expanse was so good is that it really nailed the casting.
Those are some very cute meringue sperm!
In other words, we hope it’s far, far better than the nearly unwatchable Season 1.
Didn’t need a bigger budget...it needed coherent writing and some vaguely decent acting, neither of which we got.
The want Second Life, but without all the cybersex, which eliminates about 99% of the content.
If you read “Disney Channel Original Movie”, and don’t understand that it’s on Disney +, I don’t know what to tell ya.
And they specifically said that is was streaming, which is how it should be. Default is theatre, and need to mention if it’s on a streaming site.
I know we’ve been dealing with Covid for a while now, but I think it’s once again fair to assume that if a reviewer is talking about a new movie, that it’s probably in theatres.
I will go to a theatre and buy a ticket and/or wait for it to appear on streaming to see this film.
No one should have to declare their sexuality in order to get a role.
This sounds like the cooking time would go up by a lot.