That’s still leftovers. Using food that is left over from a previous meal = leftovers.

That’s understandable. If something isn’t good the first time, then it’s not likely to be good the second time.

Because it’s not shiny and exciting?

I’m gonna need more details on why anybody wouldn’t like leftovers if they like the food on day of preparation.

My black friend that I totally have but is out of town right now uses something called “Slap Ya Momma”. It’s damn delicious.

My reason not to change is:

What’s the end game?

I think it’s fun that people need instructions on how to be human.

I have also never been hit with a cart. why would you assume I have?
I made that statement as an example. I get along fine with most people.  However, if someone builds negative rapport with me they will get what they wish.

I will treat them as they treat me.
If they are courtious and don’t push their big stocking and personnal shopper carts into me, I will do the same.

If they are jerks and act like I’m bothering them by asking for deli meat at the deli counter, I will treat them the same.

No. 

Those parts of the bible you are talking about are old testament, for the Jews. Jesus was pretty clear on being cool with everyone who wasn’t an asshole.

I haven’t read the newsletter yet, and didn’t know I was supposed to be upset about this.

Why is the role of moral arbiter a relegations?

Seems pretty important, valuable, and honorable to me.

yup, every single one

Is the case here?

Why was it a scam?

Why does the expectation exist?

I wasn’t trying to disprove your point.

That’s a fundamental disagreement I have with government, courts in particular. They think they exist to protect people. I prefer that they simply perform the function of uninterested contract law enforcement. What I think about the courts doesn’t really matter, but what they think also matters very little to me.