Who gets a “ticket” for 112 mph in a 50 mph zone? It’s ridiculous that the father let the son even look at the car again after going 112 mph in it.

This all damn day. Doja sent an unsolicited DM to a teen asking for help hooking up with his co-worker. Dude. This is the problem. Also, it’s 2022 and she’s still out here assuming that internet messages are private. This is the embodiment of “play stupid games, win stupid prizes.”  

Maybe, but we love to see accountability for rising movie stars who typically go on to be entitled fuckboys, and this is probably a good way for Schnapp to learn not to violate a woman’s privacy. If a little shit shared my DM slides, I’d probably be pissed too.

First Gear: Anyone else see a Saab 9-7x when they look at that Vinfast?

Nah, justice was served

I notice that your comment is still pending while a newer one pro AH is not. I also notice several approved pro AH comments with insults and condescension towards those they disagree with, while yours contains none of that. Maybe they will approve it still, I don’t know.

“.there is always someone who is the primary aggressor” There’s audio of Amber saying she was the one to start the violence. Then the article also says “victims respond with violent resistance or self-defense”. Why is the idea of Amber being a victim who respond with violent resistance believable but not Johnny?

Another comment based on ‘feelings,’ and rooted in confirmation bias. Remember that the UK case was Depp v. the Rupert Murdoch global media empire. Intelligence UK has researched the extensive failings of the UK justice system, you can read more here:

Thank you for saying what I’ve been thinking so much more concisely than I could conjure.

It’s even less reliable to go by what the media spins instead of actually watching the trial, which every juror has to do.

As someone who did experience domestic abuse, I kindly deny the request for me to “f off” thank you. And I don’t say it gleefully. It is painful and this trial has resurfaced a lot of emotional turmoil which I thought I had processed through already. This trial made Johnny Depp look kind of unappealing to be honest.…

No you can fuck off with your ignorant black and white views of the world

“The evidence Heard provided to demonstrate that she had been physically and emotionally harmed by Depp—witness accounts, photos of injuries, text messages, threatening audio[...]”

This was absolutely not the case tho’: the unedited audio, video, jpg files, as well as the majority of the testimonies (but one from Heard’…

“By that reasoning a woman can never be disbelieved.” - Preciesely. Kylie Cheung, I suggest you stop writing on this topic. You seem to be extremely biased here.

The UK trial was entirely different and Judge Nicol has several conflicts of interest regarding The Sun newspaper. They allowed Heard’s ‘therapist notes’ which are hearsay and at great risk of being falsified documents. They still have not been proven to be bonafide therapist notes and her hand writing is eerily…

I am a progressive feminist, pro choice, leftist, anti Musk, anti Blizzard Activision, anti Cosby, anti blockchain, hate Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas... And I’m going to (fruitlessly) tell you that this echo chamber is off base and disconnected from reality.

Nope. The juror cited many reasons for not finding Heard credible, including dishonesty and altering photographic evidence. You would know that if you bothered to read what the juror actually said, instead of reading a biased second-hand account. You could also take the time to review evidence and testimony presented…

The people defending Amber Heard post-trial are exactly the type of people who go to the end of the earth to find a missing blond haired blue eyed woman, while being unable to name a single missing woman of color. 

It's obvious she was the primary abuser.

She lied. Her evidence was non-existent. She lost. Foh with this feminist superiority bullshit and move on with your life.