iannelson1971
Ian Nelson
iannelson1971

The first time I went to Coachella, I went just so I could see Kraftwerk live, best concert ever! Anyway I was crushed up against the sound engineers area which also happened to be the VIP area, a little while into the show I looked to my right and I see Gina Gershon and she looks like she is as entranced by the music

It has nasty, sickening aftertaste that lingers long after the sweetness has faded. I have yet to find one artificial sweetener that doesn’t have it. Sucralose is the least objectionable of an objectionable lot.

I have noticed it a lot in his other articles and I find it incredibly distracting. It's not always used in the same grammatical way either, sometimes it's used in place of 'that', while others it is uses to replace 'which'. I don't remember which article, but in one of them he did it 5 or 6 times in the space of 3

Agreed! Excellent book.

You did not make exceptions in your points, so by the definition you put forward they are human, but not persons. My point is that person-hood is far more nuanced than merely genetics. It baffles me that you can argue that people agreeing that corporations have rights as people is valid but people agreeing that

So by your 3 points of definition a 3 year old human child is also not a person, nor is a severe autistic person and are not entitled to the rights and protections of person-hood. In another post you said we have never applied person-hood to a non-human being and that is false, the supreme court recently recognized

http://faculty.uca.edu/rnovy/Heinlein—All%20you%20zombies.htm

He looks way too relaxed to have been forced to sit that way. Unless of course he was drugged too. To me it just looked like he was enjoying the sunset.