There’s really only one question I have. Why?

Triumph were positioned mid way between Rover and Jaguar. A range of stylish executive sedans and a smart range of affordable sports cars. More exiting than Rover, without the ‘bankrobber/bookie’ image Jaguar sometimes suffered from.

Tesla’s car business seems to be following what used to be known as ‘The Fiat Model’: I.e. “We lose money on every car, but we make up for it with volume”.

When Chrysler put the trash compactor into production, it went haywire and crushed the entire company.

I like it. But not enough to put myself through four years of Dental School.

Ireland is planning to change. They’re going to phase it in over a fortnight.

Don’t forget the Active Suspension.

I remember , when this was launched, wondering about the ‘Italian Connection’ and whether the name was the Japanese way of saying ‘Veloce’.

Mine’s a 1.3. And being in Melbourne, it hasn’t had problems with tinworm. It’s a bit gutless, but the beauty of the chassis is you don’t have to slow down for corners. A lot like an original Mini in that regard.

Still got mine. Great chassis. But there’s a hole in the middle where the torque ought to be. I’m toying with the idea of a turbo kit, but they’re hard to find now.

And it’s a Chinese Police Station/prison to boot!

‘Copper Feel’?

If they want to sell it in China, they could keep the alpha-numerics, but just change it to ‘Q7/2'.

Could be worse. Here in Melbourne we have a swimming centre named after a Prime Minister who famously drowned at sea.

The gentlemen from Hall Green would like to take issue over Triumph’s use of the name ‘Thruxton’. There can be only one.

Far North Queensland is our Florida.

Synchronicity strikes again!

What more do you need?

It wasn’t walnut to begin with ...

If it’s battery powered shouldn’t it be called the “Aerolith’?