iamnullptr
iamnullptr
iamnullptr

Mad props to you, dood; insulting an entire culture's contributions to the art of animation is so cool and edgy.

It really depends on the type of experience the game is offering, though. Starcraft and Warcraft are completely different games from World of Warcraft and and others like it, which are persistent online worlds, and the experience further differs when we're talking about a single-player campaign versus a multi-player

The thing I have about difficulty modes in MMORPGs is that it breaks the sense of immersion, with an elevated sense of immersion always being the point behind the genre to me; like, only the best players could heroically slay Ragnaros, and if you were walking around in Molten Core gear, that meant you were one of the

Hoping the level of effort and polish he put into his other games is put into this. There are a lot of great mobile games, but not a lot of great mobile games of this kind, so here's hoping for something a little meatier on content and lighter on in-app purchases.

I don't really see the point in remaking a game if you're not going to improve upon its design, though; it has been almost 20 years since the game was released, and video games have evolved a long way since then. There are certainly many improvements that can be added to the game; Final Fantasy VII is one of the games

I'd be okay with interacting with the world via mechanical proxy bodies, actually. Imagine a "posthuman" future where individual human brains would be kept alive indefinitely in massive, well-guarded, and especially safe "server rooms" of sorts and inhabit robotic bodies capable of all the necessary human senses (Or

Ordering beef that is cooked anywhere above Medium Rare is almost as shameful as defiling the meat with steak sauce.

I know that, but my point is that your interpretation is also subjective, which is why I don't think the fact that whether or not something is "subjective" is a truly valuable discussion. We can discuss whether or not the game is overrated, but our opinions being subjective shouldn't even be brought up, because that

But if that is a matter of subjective interpretation, then is the game being "overrated" not also a subjective interpretation?

Well, as I mentioned, if the lore is what makes individual Final Fantasy games stand out among eachother, then Final Fantasy VII's was the most valuable in the series. The game was an *overt* defense of Eastern spiritual and philosophical traditions against the proselytism of Western ideas wrapped up in "cyberpunk

It was arguably overrated a decade ago; the game has received so much disproportionate backlash from "TRUE FINAL FANTASY FANS" since then that it's *underrated* at this point. The fact of the matter is that any legitimate complaints that concern VII apply to *all* other mainline Final Fantasy games, even such beloved

Looks cool, but it's almost as if they're just updating this mini-game and not the complete product out of spite...

dem souls

There appear to be several alterations between this and the previous Souls games just from these clips; movement speed, firearms, enemy behaviour, etc. If too much of it is changed, then it would lose its identity as a game and become something else entirely, but it certainly looks like enough has been improved and

So much sugar, I feel sick just looking at it. :(

Metal Gear, GTA V, Diablo 3, New Vegas and Skyrim and similar are games made by studios that have been around forever that have teams of hundreds and multi-million dollar budgets allotted to them by major publishers and wealthy investors (Often at the cost of said publishers overriding the creative decision making of

Again, whether or not something is "true injustice" is beside the point. Let's explore your logic with a simple bit of pseudocode:

That is good to know. Thank you for the clarification!

Except necessity didn't have anything to do with your original argument. After your argument was demonstrated as flawed, you, sir, moved the goalpost.

Err, no, I'm not "comparing and equating" racial oppression to the ban on drug use, I'm pointing out how your logic is flawed And inconsistent. Your argument is basically "if x law is broken, and the consequences for said law are dire, then the law breaker is irresponsible," with x being the variable: it could be