iamendlawyeregos
iamendlawyeregos
iamendlawyeregos

Here's a another good link. Let's hope the involved parties take this route:

Is that extraneous question mark after Indiana like a "why me god?" type of situation?

You are technically correct. There are several levels of potential fuckitude if a rape victim turns to law enforcement.

I like to think of it as the flipped bird of the South. Look at an electoral map.

Yep. The region is even more corrupt!

Judges in Marion County are basically chosen by the parties to be placed on the primary ballot alongside any enterprising challengers (who rarely win). In the general election there are not any challengers. It's a heavily criticised system and results in plenty of party hacks and appalling incumbents. As long as

Is it really fair for someone who is not triggered by graphic material to argue against trigger warnings. It's kind of the ultimate privileged argument: you shouldn't be bothered because I don't see the big deal. I'm sure there is room to argue about what material and issues get warnings, but how is more

I am very disappointed that this is not the start of a trend to give consequences to asshats who send threats as harrassment of women.

Did you just unironically NOT ALL MEN!? Hahahahaha

*crickets*

You say that like being slutty is a bad thing. o.0

It was news to him!

Exactly! This was meant to be a bridge for him. Notice he started up his account and tested the waters before.broaching the open relationship.

To be fair, he probably didn't even imagine that she would sign up on fetlife or try to date other people. He thought she would be home pining for him or hanging out with girlfriends. OP is an idiot!

If you can't acknowledge that mainstream porn is nearly always created to suit men's tastes, then no, an intelligent conversation is impossible. Obtuse troll, it is!

Will you read what I actually have written? 3 categories, from bad to worst. 1. Male-centric, ie. designed for primarily for men's arousal. 2. Unpleasant, ie. actively boner killing by being unkind to women (I gave some examples). 3. Degrading, ie. hostile, violent, extreme. I really don't know what your

If these are things that do not bother you, then good for you? To bring it back to the point, these things bother me now, and if I were exposed to them at age 12 as the norm, it would have discouraged me toward sex, not encouraged me to masturbate, as the op suggested. There was no internet when I was 12 and the

I was actually trying to make a bad, worse, worst distinction between male-centric, unpleasant and degrading. I don't think focusing the camera on the woman is degrading, but it does cater to men. I would prefer to see some visual focus on the man as well. Frankly, it should be against the law to take Danny

I actually find the idea that a woman can be taught to masturbate by an app pretty odd, because it is a little more complicated than a one size fits all technique. It takes hands on experience and practice to figure it out, and there are always new things to learn!

For our big health class sex lesson, the two gym teachers combined classes and co-taught. The male gym teacher said, "There are no nerves in a vagina so women do not feel anything during sex." He then turned to the female gym teacher and said, "Isn't that right?" And she nodded yes!!!!!!