Hey can we let slideshows die?

Seconded. I know it’s probably done for some ad-based clicking reason, but it really is a pain in the ass.

Hey can we let slideshows die?

Can we crowdfund someone to follow her to all her events dressed up as a plant? Is there an inflatable plant costume?

Different wrappers.

Jesus...I almost hope In ‘n’ Out was paying him under the table, because if not, we’re left with the grim reality that even The Rock, famous wrestler and giant undeserved, movie star (yes Moana was good) is this thirsty for follows. Shouldn’t people with all the money and (presumably) all the free time have better…

“I didn’t know the lingo, didn’t know who to pay, where to pay, didn’t know shit 🤦🏽‍♂️😂.”

Um, gee Nik. I’m not sure it matters who asked the question. What DOES matter is that you either wouldn’t—or couldn’t—provide even a semi-coherent response.

If a democrat asking easy-ass questions at a public debate is troublesome, I have some bad news for her if she makes it to the general election.

But what kind of Democratic plant? I’m picturing a saguaro cactus in a Warren 2020 shirt. I also like how Republicans LOVE to ignore the Southern strategy and lay claim to Abraham Lincoln every chance they get, while ignoring the implications of that pesky little Emancipation Proclamation. Piss off, Nikki.

It’s not just that he’s proselytising it, he’s been the de facto number 2 after Miscavige. He’s not just aware of the abuse, harassment, blackmail and borderline slavery of lower ranking Sea Org members, he’s responsible.

The Republican Party is a criminal conspiracy bent on fascist rule in America. If you still support ANY Republican, you are a fascist who fundamentally hates democracy and basic human rights. The things the Constitution is supposed to be based on.

Even if that were true, it wouldn’t make her cowardice any less obvious.

Wow, and you wonder why I think you bought everything coming out of his mouth, hook, line, and sinker.

Do you have a single example of a law you ‘have’ to break while driving?

“it isn’t really possible to drive for any distance or length of time without having to break some law”

So the entire point that anti-driverless car folks were making was, “When a car makes a decision like this, who is liable? We need that answer before the cars should be on the road.”

‘...it isn’t really possible to drive for any distance or length of time without having to break some law.’

Breaking AI news, Computers incapable of making moral judgements. Humans uneasy about this.

Are you out of your mind? How is that a proper analogy? 16 year olds are fighting in a war so let 16 year old here have no protection against sexual harrasment or overwork. Of course, 16 year olds can work. What the article is reporting is fact that Repubs want to do away with protections in the workplace that are in…