I have a 10 minute drive (3.4 miles, plus traffic lights), but that’s about an hour to walk, at a slightly above average walking speed. Even if it took me 45 minutes, that’s still not practical.

You made it unnecessarily about politics. You’re debating what flavour of idiot you are, but either way you’re an idiot.

I have that same issue. Do you mind tipping me off to what the part was?

It wouldn’t be kosher to admit, but the best strategy is to profile the actual people. Let’s not pretend everyone is the same in a line.

I’ve been Apple-free for 4 years. It isn’t that bad at all, plus building your own desktop PC is superior to any Apple offering unless you legitimately need portability. After using Macs for almost two decades, I can’t see myself ever buying another Apple product.

The bulk of creative professionals still think they need Macs for their work. As someone in such an industry, their brand allegiance is incredibly strong and the majority of them aren’t going anywhere.

Not to mention if the household is dual income.

It’s not always age discrimination when salaries are involved because that immediately adds a variable that changes the context.

Most people are also probably buying a house with their partner, which also changes the context. A lot of these numbers become far more manageable with a dual income situation.

And a lot of it seems to be just calling yourself out on your own BS.

Except the apps can’t actually track your sleep cycle, so what you’re explaining sounds more like a placebo effect or confirmation bias. The apps cannot determine your sleep cycle. That’s the whole theme in the article. Movement does not equate to sleep.

Except if you have solid financial habits, you’d be paying off the credit each month, not overspending, and earning the rewards and boosting your credit score.

The entire message in your article/post is that if you have poor discipline and poor financial habits, don’t make it worse by giving yourself the opportunity.

I have trouble thinking of a more ideal parabal since a game like GTA is far more of a true sandbox than most open games, but imagine if in a game like Battlefield you only got xp from kills and K/D ratios, and not from support tasks or vehicle tasks.

It's primarily just people bitching that they can't show off their fancy shit anymore, as if it really mattered anyway.

This is the key. Even if you can buy most high-end vehicles regardless of level it'd seem, that's really just for use in free roam where you're messing around.

The issue here though is that these are abitrary video game goals. None of it really matters, and these aren't things that give certain players unfair advantages like in a FPS or whatever.

Everything online is already greatly inflated versus the offline.

That line though is generally arbitrary. You could buy whatever you need with a few million, or more if you wanted things like the Titan, but even those goals are arbitrary amounts. And then what?

It was also far too long, especially with the pre-order DLC. It just dragged on and on.

I actually thought he wasn't enough of an asshole.