I’m a dude, for the record. My name is uncommon, but I’ve yet to meet a female with it.

This seems like a bit of a double standard in your argument. You originally limited it DCAU, then invoke the comics as justification for your views. That’s fine, I’ll address those too.

Because I obviously have called everyone else who responded to this thread with a challenge a troll. Only those who earn it, I’m afraid. Guess I struck a nerve. We’ll compromise, you can be an asshole too.

He would have found another way - which is what I expect heroes to do when faced with an impossible situation. As I said in another part of this thread, Superman is essentially a paladin (lawful good) who will not compromise when it comes to preventing loss of life. The character has to decide how to meet that demand.

You’re welcome to it.

DCAU Superman still has a code against killing. This guy is something else entirely lol

Wow, ok. You’re throwing around quite a lot.

The thing about Clark is that he poses for the Justice League what’s referred to in D&D as the paladin problem.

I wrote this in response to someone else (and you deserve an answer), so I’ll paraphrase here:

Instead of maybe flying him to the Fortress of Solitude and helping him understand how to control his power or to space, since this is an inorganic life form. Finding a solution that doesn’t require loss of life is what defines DC’s heroes, especially Superman.

And that’s fine. It isn’t Clark, not Bruce, and it won’t be Diana either - but these characters aren’t heroes.

Both excerpts just make me want to avoid this thing all the more.

And Transformers.

Well, that was horrific.

Honestly, this pretty much seems like Superman Blue/Red all over again. I wasn’t on board in ‘98 and I'm not now.

::watches trailer::

Refunds are fine, but it seems like overkill with a 2 week, 2 hour window. They should let people trade games for free - each license can be traded only once or twice and both parties have to agree to the trade. Kind of like Swaptree years ago.

I really can’t believe this list doesn’t include Simon Bisley.

I’m not ok with MS even having the option of intentionally bricking systems. Banning someone from a service is one thing, but people purchased that hardware - it does not belong to MS, regardless of how it is used or who owns it. That they claim that right is the bigger scandal, in my view.

Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll reveal an evil mouse working behind the scenes - just like in real life! 😜