hulkjudgment
Gawker's $115M Hulk Judgment
hulkjudgment

If you can’t beat ‘em...

The editing down from the Ultimate Cut certainly led to issues, but it’s still possible to read between the lines. Snyder loves using visual cues to inform viewers. For example, Superman attempted to use the exact same fighting moves on Superman as he used on Zod in MoS. We also never saw him fighting anyone his equal

The alien does battle with an underwear-clad Sandra Bullock who just arrived one lake over.

I took that one scene as foreshadowing that they could kill Michonne and then Rick would fail to take his own advice and break down.

I desperately wanted to like TRON:Legacy, but there’s no story there...it’s a string of ideas mashed into proximity with one-another.

When I heard that Thomas Jane had been cast as Miller, I didn’t like it. But, I’ll be damned if he isn’t one of the best parts of the show. And, agreed on Bobbi.

All throughout the first season, I thought that Amos had been totally miscast. With the first two episodes this season, Wes Chatham has gone a long way towards making me rethink my opinion. He was really good last night.

If Trump knew about this and didn’t do anything to stop it, then isn’t that considered treason?

Captain America is a modern myth, a person turned into a demi-god or god fighting monsters. Alien is basically about truckers getting into trouble at a pitstop and fighting to survive.

You’re missing the point. Things like replicants and aliens are a possibility. Thor, The Hulk, Superman etc. are not

Scott didn’t do Aliens. That was Cameron.

It makes far more sense to update the algorithm, using word series to sort results in a different manner of relevance, rather than filter them out, which could cause multiple other problems as well.

Knowingly providing links to outright lies from the world’s largest soapbox is promoting those lies.

So not promoting articles which expressly deny the existence of the Holocaust is now a “curated ideological agenda” giving a “palatable liberal facade”?

Constitution aside, inherently this is a bad thing. First it happened to copyright infringers, and I said nothing because I wasn’t a copyright infringer, and then they came for the holocoast deniers, but I said nothing because I wasn’t a holocoast denier..

The information provided is completely false. So no harm at all is done by removing it.

The First Amendment can only be violated by the government, not by other individuals.

Anyone else think this is a bad thing?

I’m with you.

Well it is not Birmingham’s fault people from L.A., New York, and London are too fucking stupid to open up a book and read the definition of town and city and what the difference is, so they dont sound like insufferable, ignorant asses when they open their mouths and vomit their words at people.