I guess my point is that for some people it is a legitimate medical problem, and it isn’t as simple as just holding it, because sometimes we literally can’t. I think there should be some kind of recognition of that. I don’t think it excuses truly reckless driving, but there is a difference between really reckless…

Yeah. Usually I’m close to a bathroom anyway, and if i’m driving I can pull over at a fast food place or gas station or whatever. But for instance, if I’m heading towards home there is good 2 miles or so (10 minutes driving, depending on lights/traffic) that is mostly residential and there is nowhere to stop if I had…

Better than shitting in your car.

This is my nightmare.

It’s almost as if Jezebel doesn’t really believe in standing up for women or feminism, and their fake ideology is really just a tool of convenience used to beat up their political opponents.

This makes no sense.

Whether the rape occurred is irrelevant to the contract claim though.

But I guess you could argue that she could breach, get a damage judgment, and then bankrupt it. You are still talking a few years to get to that point.

Which in this case would be very high.

That was my thought too. She should write a bunch of songs about being raped by Dr. Luke and how Sony wouldn’t let her out of her contract. But yeah, they probably have some say-so over what gets released.

I’m an unabashed fan of Kesha and I’ve purchased everything she has released, and I look forward to the day when she releases new music again. As a fan, I hoped this would go her way. But I’m also a lawyer, and sadly for her, I think this is probably a correct ruling. There is really no basis for voiding a commercial…

Not that Jezebel or Gawker actually cares what the Constitution actually says, some marginally snarky bullshit from the president is enough.

Chipotle is just an uppity version of Moe’s or Qdoba with less options and more shitting.

enjoy your squirts

I rarely know very much at all about the authors I read. Who sits around considering what to read based on the superficial traits of the author rather than the subject matter of the book?

Double action revolvers are pretty common.

Yes. It’s called a double-action revolver. It uses a different mechanism, i.e. the chambering isn’t the result of the slide blowing back, but the result is the same. One trigger pull = one shot fired, without the need to recock the pistol every time.

Apparently you didn’t grow up around guns enough to know what a semi-automatic weapon is.

Wrong.

At least we won’t have to hear her slur her way through her liberal propaganda any more.