Don’t worry. It’s fine.

But what if you envision it as the bottom of the valley? Charts are just how you look at them, man.

ASBDWBNTYI.

Ok, but those are guest writers. You can argue that’s moving the goalposts, but I would argue those two guest writers’ articles don’t reflect the typical way it was handled on this site and that the goalposts aren’t being moved at all.

I agree with you, I was making the point that sometimes this site intentionally ignores that. A pure, “it’s okay when the person I like does it” bullshit. Obviously, in that case, Hillary’s position WAS worse, but Bernie got a pass others haven’t been allowed. He can fuck up as much as he can, but others are tossed…

Man, it was such a better time when calling someone an SJW was an actual insult before mouthbreathers like you took it to mean “someone who might be a little sensitive towards inequality”.

You’re right, I should just stick to Deadspin, the only arguments I get sucked into there are when arguing with Trust the Process dorks.

Yes, you’re right, a Senator is more than the most recent year and a half. Like how Bernie got a pass here for voting on that crime bill in the 90s but Hillary didn’t for just supporting it. She gets shit on for supporting measures as a compromise, so him feeling the crime bill was a compromise is no excuse according…

My guess? Frank Stallone.

Definitely No. Border Patrol is different than ICE.

Eagles fans are singularly bad in the universe.

Oh, I’m well aware it failed.

FYI, this site often calls Kamala Harris a fake progressive, bring up Tammy Baldwin or Ron Wyden only if they criticize Trump, can’t wait to call Gillibrand “Hilary 2.0", and don’t think they’ve ever mentioned Merkley.

You acknowledge it later, but yes, this was just an (what I thought was obvious since one of the people who apparently didn’t get still it immediately went to the 538 voting record I thought I was obviously referencing as if I didn’t know it existed) complaint about how two politicians with nearly the exact same…

Yes, it is deeply weird, yet this site does it ALL THE TIME.

So, where’s the criticism on this site of Bernie for his sudden “Oh no! I’m totally against guns now that all you cool hip kids don’t like ‘em” flip so he could get on camera, or his “You know, anti aboortion isn’t that bad if you’re liberal economically?” shit, or his complete and utter inability to have made any…

Just making you go through the effort of having to dismiss this post since you’re going to be an ass about it. THERE. NOW I’M TROLLING YOU.

That is a problem of mine, but no, I was literally just pointing out that on 538's vote tracking site, Booker and Sanders are effectively tied. The difference is literally 3 votes all regarding nominees for government posts. Yet while the worst of the three was the one Bernie voted for, Sanders is praised on this site…

I had previously said I was pulling my reasoning for my original statement from 538's voting record. I didn’t think I needed to restate where I was getting my information from.

Ok, had to look it up. The difference between Bernie Sanders and Cory Booker is Booker voting for Haley for U.N. and some trade representative while Sanders voted for John Kelly’s nomination Yet this site treats Cory Booker like a piece of shit while Bernie Sanders is super best number one. Which is quite fucked up.