You are so fucking dumb you can’t even use spell-check correctly. 

As long as a vegan who demands vegan food when invited to someone’s place also, when hosting the same people who provided a vegan dish, prepares a meat dish for guests who demand meat, that’s cool. If the vegan does not reciprocate, they are fucking assholes. It’s quite simple and quite fair.

You're correct. He's wrong. 

That’s not my argument asshole. My argument is that vegans cannot expect meat-free meals from meat-eaters if the same vegans refuse to provide meat for meat-eating guests. It’s quite simple. It's quite fair. It’s all about the expectation, if you would actually read my responses.

I never thought I had to explain to someone that I never said anything about carnivores when I never mentioned anything about carnivores.

For fucks sake how many times do I have to say not only meat. Fuck, I’m not dense enough to think every vegetarian meal is made up of only vegetables. “For dinner, here’s a plate of carrots. For dessert, a plate of broccoli.” And you call me dense? Fuck off you elitist prick. If you need to misrepresent what I wrote,…

If you would read my response, you’d see that I put in the caveat that this only applies when one side is demanding accomodations they refuse to supply to others. Which encompasses the majority of your latest response.

What part of my argument do you find illegitimate? If you are unable to respond by pointing out the failure in my argument, STFU.

Still waiting for a coherent response. All I read was "I can't come up with anything good to respond." 

I never said meat only. I said someone who requires or chooses to have meat at every meal. Some people on an Atkins type of diet may only be eating meat, I don’t know. All I can say is if someone wants to eat meat for every meal, I’m not going to question their choice. Just as I’m not going to question someone’s…

So you don’t have a response? Then why did you reply? You can't come up with a good argument against mine?

Whether or not you eat meat is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to your argument and mine. My problem is that you are talking morals about fucking food. Seriously, shove morals right up your ass.

Harris is a cop, but you think that’s irrelevant? You’re saying Bernie’s record shows he should sit this one out, yet you don’t even want Harris’s record discussed? Shouldn’t every candidate be properly vetted? Which parts of every candidate’s record should be hidden from the public? What should we care about vs what…

Why? What is false about the argument? 

It is not a false equivalence. Barring allergies, we all choose what we eat. CHOOSE.

Are you sure you want to say this? Do you want to tell people what they should eat? If so, then the corollary, allergies aside, should apply as well: Then it isn’t hard to have a meal with meat or cheese once in a while.

Either he is a pro-wall conservative and is using the tired “I was only joking” tactic to back-pedal and hide his hateful ideology, or he really is joking, in which case his comedic ability points to him being a pro-wall conservative with a hateful ideology.

Convenient that the average US high school teaches jack shit about US-South American history (not to mention Israel/Middle East history, which is more than tangentially related to this story), so you can get nearly the entire country to go along with interventionist foreign policy without questioning if it’s the right…

Universities, even public ones, have codes of conduct. Behavior like this may fall under the terms.

Correct take. You know who doesn't have to hear "if you can't keep them out of the end zone, you don't deserve to win?" the fucking team that gave up 3 TDs in the 4th quarter.