A history of exchanges with Kevin being thin-skinned about simple observations or criticisms when he’s a writer for a blog that has a comment section that exists specifically for reader feedback? Sure. But that was the exchange that got me banned, because he knows he got owned. If he can’t take it, he shouldn’t dish…

Yup - proving that they’re all thin-skinned children. Speaking of, thin-skinned, Kevin Pang just banned me from The Takeout for this exchange:

...and then there’s the remix:

Nirvana Shovel guy is much better:

...writing for a site that relies primarily on what others post online for their own (online) content.

It seems her issue is that he is online, just like she is.

Let’s not forget how she went a step further in the stupidity with her response to (at least) one commenter (and got rightfully annihilated for it):

I don’t think someone who makes their living online (working for an outlet that relies extremely heavily on online posts for its content that it in turn posts online) is in any position to criticize others for being online. This post exists solely to criticize someone’s posts for criticizing someone else’s posts -…

I’m surprised you didn’t suggest making them with “hash browns.”

Learn what “emotional” means.

Learn what proper hash browns look like.

Good for you. Doesn’t change the fact that I’ve never seen anyone anywhere make / serve hash browns that look like this, nor the fact that I would not want to eat them, nor the fact that (to me) it looks like a cracker. 

I can honestly say that not once in my life have I ever seen anyone anywhere make / serve hash browns that look like this, nor would I want to eat them. This looks like a cracker.

“Evidently the president missed the thousands of people jeering his visit in nearby Trafalgar Square where, once again, the giant Trump baby balloon flew above the crowd.”

Yes, we were given his opinion on the issue because he was asked to give it - so why the childish “No one was dying to hear Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s opinion on...” BS?

The business model, which clearly is not working, is her fault - not that of the customers. People go there for the food because they serve food and she makes a point of advertising the food. It is clearly not a “drinks only” establishment.

“I am not sure what part of “We are a bar not a restaurant. If you don’t want to drink alcohol, we have an excellent range of low sugar mocktails and non alcoholic alternatives” you are not comprehending.” 

The establishment in question offers food and drink. They also heavily advertise the food on their facebook page. She can call it whatever she wants, but it functions as a restaurant and there are people who go there specifically for the food (which is on offer to bring in customers). The customers the owner is…

You don’t have to take my word for it - you can just read the statement; it’s a direct acknowledgement.

“The hurricane mistake might be the verbal equivalent of a typo, sure.”