I haven’t flagged any of your comments - I dismissed them (I have rules as well).

It’s funny how incredibly upset some of you are about the idea of having to follow rules (especially when you are on someone else’s property). It’s very childish.

The question, as posed in the headline, implied in the letter, and quoted in my comment, is specifically about the rules with regard to bringing outside food into movie theaters.

“I read just fine” 

Not sure what’s pedantic about pointing out I never said something I never said.

Yes, what I said was “I just bring a water bottle.” A water bottle is a bottle for putting water in. I did not say I bring a bottle of water.

Exactly. She has also advocated in the past for stealing soda water from (fast-food type) restaurants (the kind with self-serve soda fountains).

“It’s a drink, is it not? And by bringing your own, you are depriving the theater of sales of a bottle of water, are you not?” 

“So water doesn’t fall under the “drink” part of no outside food or drink?”

“there’s nothing illegal about bringing outside food into a theatre.”

“And as someone who thinks hungry theater patrons are “glutinous”, consider your glass house before telling others to “read better.” 

I have yet to see any posted rule regarding water bottles at any movie theater I’ve been to. But yes - if they ask to inspect it, I happily comply.

“That doesn’t mean the consumer has to oblige them in their money grab.”

Again, read better.

“I disagree..”

I don't think you understand what the term "narc" means.

There is no counterpoint. What’s fair is for you to respect / follow the rules to which you agreed when you purchased the ticket / entered someone else's property. 

I didn’t say I sneak in a $1.00 bottle of water. Read better.

Yeah, I’m capable of surviving the length of a movie without food, even - I just bring a water bottle.

I think the law varies by state, and I believe it would have to be shown that Wohl gained a benefit (financial gain, etc) and/or caused harm to the person he impersonated (defrauding / financial loss, etc) - not sure this meets that requirement under the law. Damaging the reputation of the person impersonated may or…