Nice car for NPOND for sure, but quick research shows that 185k appears to be about 20K more than anyone else has gotten. Since many classic car values have been contracting a bit of late, I’d say the seller is overreaching. ND.

(see what I did there?)

Too bad the Denver car is not a 6 speed as advertised. I like it much better at $12K than this one at 8.

Nice! Lightweight and agile, bullet-proof reliable, and guaranteed to maintain value like a Toyota. Oh wait...

Yes! Not much power by today’s standards, but oh, that glorious noise!

He’s wasting everyone’s time by asking 81 large for ten minutes of total effort (detailing and ad composition included). Good thing he’s only testing the waters.

What? $5500 for this econo-relic? Seller must have hit the CP before conjuring up that price.

Wow....

They are looking for new customers, therefore ads. If you’re an existing customer, they already have your money. Not a recipe for long-term success, I’ll admit, but that’s what they seem to be going for.

He/she... Regardless, it’s a bad look for someone who reviews and writes about cars for a living.

A new car in the teens?  Which decade did you time-warp back to?

Sorry.  Elon knows what’s best for you.

You make an excellent point.  PHEV is an odd requirement if this is going to be a road trip machine.

70% less than average? I call BS on that. By that math, an “average vehicle” that depreciates from 100k to 50k in five years would still be worth 85k?  I’m sure my math is flawed somehow, but you get the idea.

The ad is contradictory.

Was just there for a concert last week, and wondered the same thing.

Jim, Jeff, whatever....

Jim Carrey? I guess I’m not making the connection.

My brain read that as “Fart” edition for a split second.  Freudian slip?

Sorry for your crappy experience. I’d be pissed, especially since the data he was reacting to was clearly in error.